Woofun AI reports that White House encryption advisor Patrick Witt characterized Democratic objections to the CLARITY Act's ethical provisions as "unfounded." Witt identified two primary criticisms: that provisions are meaningless if state attorneys general cannot enforce them, and that they are unacceptable if they do not hold President Trump accountable for past industry involvement. He argued that the first stance implies all federal ethics laws are pointless since none are enforced by state officials. Regarding the second, he noted that demanding such accountability violates Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution.