Woofun AI reports that the Bitcoin network is entering the final three-week countdown to block 961,632, where the BIP-110 proposal aims to restrict Ordinals via a user-activated soft fork. Adam Back, CEO of Blockstream, has publicly condemned the initiative, arguing that the measure lacks both technical feasibility and ideological legitimacy within the ecosystem.

The proposal’s mechanism mandates a one-year freeze on non-monetary transactions, with validating nodes programmed to reject blocks lacking explicit support signals once the designated height is reached. This structural change is scheduled to take effect by July 20, 2026, fundamentally altering how data is processed on the chain. The code requires miners to signal their endorsement, creating a binary choice for infrastructure operators.

Ideologically, Adam Back characterizes the attempt to filter data as subjective censorship that violates network neutrality. He argues that enforcing such rules without broad consensus undermines the decentralized nature of the protocol. Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, echoed this opposition, asserting that transaction fees must remain determined by the free market dynamics of block space supply and demand rather than artificial restrictions.

Per Woofun AI, current signaling from mining pools stands at a mere 0.86%, drastically short of the 55% of total hash rate required for activation. This disparity highlights a severe lack of adoption among infrastructure operators. Market analysts note the absence of liquidity or futures contracts tied to this fork, further isolating the proposal from financial support.

Adam Back predicts a low-processing scenario where the modified branch will fail to sustain valid block production due to insufficient computing power. As the network approaches block 961,632, the technical viability of the resulting chain will be tested against the reality of modified nodes. This marks a critical juncture where ideological ambition clashes with economic and technical constraints.