
Helium HNT
Helium leads in economic modeling and team governance, with technical implementation remaining a key focus and currently holding a B rating.
Sector Rank #66 · Global Rank #87
Overall Rating
B · 72.85 / 100Helium has an overall rating Bf D (total 72.85), ranking high in six dimensions for economic model, team governance, and security compliance. The main deductible point is technical implementation (68.9 points)—a dimension lower than other dimensions in the six-dimensional score.
Rating Team Conclusion: "Helium has relative advantages in economic modeling, team governance, and security compliance, but its current shortcomings are focused on technical implementation." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
71/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?The core migration event has been completed, but detailed delivery rate data is lacking.Weight 35%About 75% · 75 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?A major recent milestone: Solana migration has been completed.Weight 30%1 / 4 (Solana migration) · 70 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?There is a lack of detailed information on publicly available pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%Existence (exact number unknown) · 70 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of clear historical delay records, so it is presumed to be underestimated.Weight 15%Somewhat less · 65 / 100
Technical Implementation
68.25/100Consensus Mechanism?It adopts Solana's mature PoH + PoS hybrid consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoH + PoS (mature) · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running stably for about six years, giving it a certain history.Weight 15%About 6 years · 80 / 100
Recent upgrades?Successfully migrating to Solana marks a major technical milestone for the project.Weight 35%Solana Migration (Major Upgrade) · 65 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of diversity data on Helium clients, and the Solana ecosystem needs improvement.Weight 20%Insufficient data (Solana ecosystem) · 40 / 100
Tokenomics
79.75/100Deflationary Mechanism?Deflation is achieved by minting Data Credits through HNT burning.Weight 30%Existence (HNT Burn Cast DC) · 85 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a halving mechanism, and the inflation rate gradually decreases over time.Weight 25%Gradually reduced (with a halving mechanism) · 80 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of clear staking rate data, but hotspot operators are required to stake.Weight 25%Insufficient data (hotspot operator staking) · 65 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to value stability.Weight 20%223 million HNT · 90 / 100
Team Governance
75.75/100Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and a long history of the project.Weight 30%Experienced (multiple core members) · 85 / 100
Governance mechanisms?DAO governance mechanisms have been established, but the degree of decentralization remains to be seen.Weight 25%Existence (DAO Governance) · 75 / 100
Financial Transparency?High funding amounts, but limited transparency information on fund usage.Weight 25%Insufficient data (high total financing) · 70 / 100
Concentration of key people?The core team still has considerable influence on project development.Weight 20%Normal · 70 / 100
Market Ecosystem
69.5/100Active Address?Lack of active address data, with the number of hotspots being a more important indicator.Weight 30%Insufficient data (the number of hotspots is even more critical) · 75 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has migrated to the Solana ecosystem, but its own ecosystem is limited.Weight 25%1 (Solana) · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project mainly focuses on the Internet of Things, with a relatively low DeFi TVL.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 70 / 100
Developer community?GitHub activity data is insufficient, and the developer community is relatively small.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 60 / 100
Security & Compliance
73.5/100Historical Major Failure?Lack of a public record of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%&None · 90 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?There is uncertainty regarding the regulatory classification of decentralized network tokens.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 70 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC has not yet reached a clear conclusion on the classification of such tokens as securities.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 70 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on the frequency of client bugs.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 60 / 100
B Peer Comparison
Export CSV HeliumB · 72.85 | VictionB · 73.33 | FlowB · 73.28 | ARKB · 73.17 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 72.85 | 73.33 | 73.28 | 73.17 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 70.9 | 74.5 | 72.23 | 72.78 |
| Technical Implementation | 68.9 | 71.7 | 65.5 | 64.7 |
| Tokenomics | 80.5 | 81 | 76.3 | 76.3 |
| Team Governance | 75.5 | 72.62 | 72.14 | 72.8 |
| Market Ecosystem | 70.1 | 69.85 | 75.83 | 74 |
| Security & Compliance | 72 | 71.62 | 74.86 | 75.79 |



Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.