Binance 披露 63 亿美元被盗攻击过程

Binance claims 98% of assets were restored via SAFU, but the timeline shows a four-month window where Engineer C's access was breached. That duration allows attackers to move significant value before detection. While the frozen amount of $2.85B is substantial, the remaining exposure after restores still represents a non-trivial loss. How does the platform verify the integrity of internal AI tools used by engineers to prevent similar supply chain compromises?

6.3B stolen but 98% restored via SAFU; checking if remaining exposure justifies current position sizing.

Binance's reliance on internal AI tools to trace the breach across multiple engineers reveals a dangerous dependency chain. Even with 98% of funds restored via SAFU, the sequence of compromises suggests perimeter security gaps that yield farming protocols should scrutinize before locking liquidity there.