CFTC 主席称将推进加密市场结构规则

Selig clarifies the CFTC's path forward for on-chain perpetuals, but the spot market still relies on Congress. The agency knows its limits, yet moving regulated derivatives seems the most practical step for now.

Selig's assertion that statutory authority covers perpetual contracts while spot markets remain legislative grey areas needs closer look. The plan to reassess 24/7 algorithmic trading frameworks suggests a pivot from passive monitoring to active rule creation. However, the lack of jurisdiction over spot markets leaves a critical regulatory gap. Does this bifurcated oversight create compliance friction for exchanges bridging both markets? The disconnect between centralized perpetual oversight and decentralized spot realities remains a structural issue.

CFTC eyes perp oversight, but spot jurisdiction gap leaves leverage exposure unmitigated. Position sizing gets tricky again.

Selig's claim on authority doesn't mean spot markets get regulated soon. Where are the actual leverage limits before position sizing gets risky?