Bitget 批评 DeFi 安全漏洞并致谢 NEAR Intents

Bitget blaming DeFi security after the $387.5M loss, but did NEAR Intents actually recover the funds or just help trace them? The yield farming environment seems shaky when protocols handle large sums so recklessly.

Bitget pointing fingers at DeFi protocols after the $387.5M loss. Security gaps in these contracts remain a major risk that shouldn't be ignored by anyone holding long term.

Bitget owes NEAR Intents a backdoor note for saving those 387.5M? How's the entry price looking post-recovery?

Bitget's push for better DeFi security after such a huge loss feels necessary, yet recovery timelines remain uncertain. When will protocols actually fix these fundamental vulnerabilities?

Bitget blaming DeFi after the $387.5M loss? Does this shift risk or just shift blame on price action?