SBF 向美最高法院申请重审 110 亿美元罚没

SBF 向美最高院申请重审 110 亿罚没，辩方核心论点之一是相信 FT 与 Alameda 曾持足额资产，客户本息已获偿。这说法与第二巡回法院维持原判的逻辑如何兼容？检方采纳受害者损失证据的合规性若真存争议，审前程序具体细节到了什么程度才构成推翻定罪的依据？

SBF fighting an $11B fine feels wild, especially since he's already in prison for 25 years.

SBF's petition targets the $11B slashing and fraud conviction, arguing flawed evidence admission regarding victim losses. The core legal battle hinges on whether courts must prove actual harm when relying on fraudulent inducement claims. If the Second Circuit's June ruling allowing implied losses stands, could similar financial penalties in high-profile fraud cases face constitutional challenges under the Eighth Amendment regarding future earning capacity? This sets a precedent for how large fines are adjudicated when principal recovery isn't strictly proven.

SBF 申请重审那 110 亿罚没，他现在坐牢感觉这事真能翻盘吗。