1INCH 1INCH

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap milestone data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity is trending poorly and upgrade delivery information is opaque.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 10 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 15 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public historical deferral records, difficult to assess.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a Dex aggregator, inherits the consensus mechanism of the underlying EVM chain.Weight 30%Inherit the underlying chain consensus (PoS/PoSA) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project has been online since 2021 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%About 4.5 years · 80 / 100

Recent upgrades?The recent launch of the new protocol Aqua shows that the project continues to evolve.Weight 35%New protocol Aqua (2025-11) · 85 / 100

Client Diversity?As a DApp, you don't directly own client diversity.Weight 20%Not Applicable (DApp) · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%No explicit deflation mechanism · 15 / 100

Inflation rate?The contract carries the risk of issuing additional tokens.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 5 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The position lock-up ratio is extremely low and TVL has a small relative market capitalization.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a supply cap, but the contract can issue additional tokens.Weight 20%1.5 billion (at risk of additional issuance) · 40 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are open and have a good background.Weight 30%Team is open and transparent · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?It has a mature Dao governance mechanism with high governance intensity.Weight 25%Dao Governance (Proven) · 90 / 100

Financial Transparency?Transparent funding and investment from a number of reputable institutions.Weight 25%High transparency · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?There is a risk of centralization of contract ownership and a high degree of authority concentration.Weight 20%Risk of centralization · 30 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is at a moderate level.Weight 30%Normal · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Widely deployed on multiple mainstream public chains and L2 networks.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment (14 +) · 90 / 100

DeFi TVL?The DeFi TVL of the project itself is relatively low.Weight 25%~ $2.8m (under) · 55 / 100

Developer community?GitHub activity data is missing or inactive, and community engagement is questionable.Weight 20%Low activity · 30 / 100

Historical Major Failure?A major safety incident has occurred and there is a serious safety red line.Weight 25%Hacked (2025) · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The contract has additional issuance authority and faces serious regulatory and compliance risks.Weight 30%There is a serious compliance risk · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The contract has additional issuance authority and faces serious sec and compliance risks.Weight 30%There is a serious compliance risk · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a risk that the authority of the contract to issue additional tokens will be leaked, which is a serious vulnerability.Weight 15%There is a risk of additional issuance authority · 0 / 100