Across Protocol ACX

Ethereum EcosystemInfrastructureCross-chain bridge

Across Protocol leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus and currently holding a D- rating.

Rating updated 2026-08-03
D-23.97 / 100

Sector Rank #725 · Global Rank #1416

Roadmap Delivery0F
Technical Implementation----
Tokenomics0F
Team Governance87.17B+
Market Ecosystem53.93E
Security & Compliance0F
01

Overall Rating

D- · 23.97 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
87.17
Market Ecosystem
53.93
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
23.97

Across Protocol overall rating D- (total 24.3), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).

Rating Team Conclusion: "Across Protocol has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and roadmap delivery, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

0/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of public records of recent upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Technical Implementation

30/100

Consensus Mechanism?Adopts an optimistic verification mechanism, relying on the underlying chain security.Weight 30%Optimistic verification and relay network · 60 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running stably since November 2021.Weight 15%About 4.5 years · 80 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of public data on the quality of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of data on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Tokenomics

20/100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear data on deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a lack of clear inflation rate data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of data on ACX token staking or staking rates.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%1 billion units · 100 / 100

Team Governance

75.75/100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and industry experience.Weight 30%The core team is highly experienced · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are sound, and community participation is high.Weight 25%Community governance is active and transparent · 95 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financing information is disclosed, and the use of funds is highly transparent.Weight 25%High transparency of funds · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?There are risks of proxy contracts and high concentration of holdings.Weight 20%Risk of centralization · 20 / 100

Market Ecosystem

51.5/100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is average.Weight 30%Normal · 55 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has widely integrated multiple mainstream EVM-compatible chains.Weight 25%Six chains have been integrated · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?As a cross-chain bridge, the TVL scale is acceptable.Weight 25%Approximately $23.23 million · 60 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community active data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Security & Compliance

2.5/100

Historical Major Failure?There are risks of agency contracts and potential permission leaks.Weight 25%There is a safety red line · 10 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory attitude information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Lack of clear SEC stance information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on the frequency of client bugs.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

04

D- Peer Comparison

Export CSV
Across ProtocolD- · 23.97RogueD- · 26.66GaiAID- · 26.65Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64
Overall Score23.9726.6626.6526.64
Roadmap Delivery037.537.537.5
Technical Implementation--------
Tokenomics0000
Team Governance87.17305670.72
Market Ecosystem53.939.6359.9851.84
Security & Compliance051.7500

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions