Aerodrome Finance AERO

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of clear delivery data, inference based on models.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of clear delivery data, inference based on models.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of clear delivery data, inference based on models.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of clear delivery data, inference based on models.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Inheriting Ethereum's mature PoS consensus mechanism, it offers high security.Weight 30%Inheriting Ethereum PoS (mature) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a relatively short time but has been running stably.Weight 15%About 2.6 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available details of recent technology upgrades and quality assessment data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?There is a lack of public data on the diversity of project clients.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Tokens can be issued in additional minting, but there is no clear deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%No clear deflationary mechanism, additional issuance is allowed · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Tokens can be issued additionally, but the specific inflation rate data is not transparent.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance, and data is insufficient · 38.9 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The token lock-up rate is extremely low, and liquidity mining TVL does not represent token staking.Weight 25%Approximately 0% (token lock-up rate) · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Tokens can be issued in additional shares, with no strict supply cap.Weight 20%No Hard Limit (Can Be Issued Again) · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team background and VC endorsement scores are relatively low.Weight 30%Moderate team background · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance authenticity scores are moderate, lacking a multi-signature mechanism.Weight 25%Risk of centralization · 50 / 100

Financial Transparency?Proposal voting and funding transparency scores are average.Weight 25%Normal · 50 / 100

Concentration of key people?Permission concentration is moderate, with some risk of centralization.Weight 20%medium-high · 50 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is at a moderate level.Weight 30%Normal · 58.7 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is mainly deployed on a single chain with low cross-chain liquidity.Weight 25%Single (Base) · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?As the main DEX on the Base chain, it has a relatively large TVL scale.Weight 25%Approximately $347 million · 73.4 / 100

Developer community?Lack of third-party integrations and active developer community data.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There was a domain hijacking incident that led to user financial losses.Weight 25%domain hijacking, resulting in losses of about $700,000 · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lacking clear regulatory compliance information, DeFi projects often face regulatory challenges.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Tokens can be issued additionally and may be considered securities by the SEC, which is controversial.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of publicly available data on the frequency of client bugs.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100