Alphabet xStock GOOGLX

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and milestone delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent escalation information is missing to assess delivery.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Consensus mechanisms adopted by undisclosed projects.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime, and its stability remains to be seen.Weight 15%About 1 year · 20 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?Client diversity information has not been disclosed.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflation mechanism design was found.Weight 30%No public information available · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a lack of public inflation rate data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No staking or lock-up mechanisms or related data were found.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a total supply cap, but there is a lack of other value capture mechanisms.Weight 20%Approximately 465,000 · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?There is limited background information about the core team and lacks public disclosure.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The project is non-decentralized, and governance mechanisms are generally transparent.Weight 25%Centralised · 42 / 100

Financial Transparency?There is a lack of public fund information, and transparency needs improvement.Weight 25%Average · 42 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten crypto-holding addresses are highly concentrated, posing risks of centralization.Weight 20%High · 0 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is excellent, and market participation is high.Weight 30%High · 100 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream chains and possesses cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not a DeFi protocol and lacks direct TVL data, but its ecosystem has potential.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 54.9 / 100

Developer community?There is a lack of public data on developer community activity, but the project does receive some attention.Weight 20%Average · 54.9 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are backdoor code and permission leaks, posing extremely high security risks.Weight 25%Backdoor code exists · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory information regarding the project.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?There is a lack of clear information about the SEC's stance on the project.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency makes it impossible to evaluate.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100