Apple xStock AAPLX

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of public records of recent upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No clear pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public information on historical deferral records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As tokenized stocks, it relies on the underlying chain and lacks independent consensus.Weight 30%Centralized Custody (Multi-chain) · 20 / 100

Main network years of operation?The main network of the project has been operating for a short time and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%About 0.8 years · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of publicly available up-to-date escalation information and quality assessments.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflationary mechanisms or token burn records have been found.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a lack of public inflation rate data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The proportion of staking or lock-up is extremely low, resulting in concentrated liquidity.Weight 25%About 0% · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to value stability.Weight 20%598,781.89 AAPLX · 80 / 100

Core Development Team?Lack of public development team information, average background.Weight 30%Insufficient data (average background) · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Token holding is highly concentrated, with centralized governance mechanisms.Weight 25%Centralization (High Concentration) · 10 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of public information on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token holding is highly concentrated, posing single-point risk.Weight 20%Extremely high · 0 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is excellent, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%High (100/100) · 100 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream chains, with broad ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%6 chains · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves, resulting in low integration.Weight 25%Insufficient data (low project TVL) · 10 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries risks of backdoor code and permission leakage.Weight 25%Backdoor code exists · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Tokenized stocks face regulatory uncertainty and controversy.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 10 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC takes a cautious stance on tokenized stocks.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 10 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100