Arbitrum ARB

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of near-term roadmap and on-time delivery data makes accurate assessment impossible.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?The project remains active, with clear upgrade proposals and development activities.Weight 30%Continuously active, with upgrade proposals · 60 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?The roadmap is clear, including important milestones such as decentralized sorting.Weight 20%Decentralized sorting, ZK proofs, Stylus · 70 / 100

History Extension Record?No clear record of significant delays was found in historical data.Weight 15%No clear records · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Uses mature Optimistic Rollups, but L1 scores suggest areas for improvement.Weight 30%Optimistic Rollup (inheriting Ethereum security) · 40 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has operated stably for nearly five years, accumulating rich experience.Weight 15%About 4.75 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Code updates are active, but quality scores show room for improvement.Weight 35%Active but with low quality scores · 20 / 100

Client Diversity?As an L2, it mainly relies on a single client, with limited diversity.Weight 20%Nitro (single client) · 20 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%No explicit deflation mechanism · 20 / 100

Inflation rate?The total supply is fixed, but a large number of tokens are continuously unlocked, creating inflationary pressures.Weight 25%Fixed total supply, continuously unlocked · 60 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and the market circulation is large.Weight 25%Very Low · 40 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap to avoid unlimited issuance.Weight 20%10 billion (fixed) · 100 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team is highly experienced and backed by top VCs.Weight 30%Rich experience, strong VC support · 60 / 100

Governance mechanisms?It adopts a DAO governance model with a high degree of decentralization.Weight 25%DAO Governance (High Decentralization) · 85 / 100

Financial Transparency?High transparency in fund management and proposal voting.Weight 25%Highly transparent · 85 / 100

Concentration of key people?Permission concentration is moderately high, so potential risks should be monitored.Weight 20%medium-high · 40 / 100

Active Address?High number of daily active addresses, with a solid ecosystem user base.Weight 30%High activity · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It owns multiple L2 chains, making the ecosystem highly scalable.Weight 25%Multiple L2s (Arbitrum One, Nova) · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi has a high total value locked, demonstrating strong ecosystem appeal.Weight 25%Approximately $3.79 billion · 80 / 100

Developer community?The developer community is active, with high code contributions and star counts.Weight 20%Active and large-scale · 80 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There is a risk of backdoor code and permission leakage, triggering a security red line.Weight 25%There are backdoor codes and permission leaks · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, indicating significant compliance risks.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's compliance scores are extremely low, posing potential regulatory risks.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There are security red line issues, and the client faces high potential risks.Weight 15%There is a safety red line · 0 / 100