B3 (Base) B3

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available near-term roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of publicly available information on recent upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 37.5 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As an L2, it inherits Ethereum's PoS security but faces challenges.Weight 30%Optimistic Rollup (inherited from Ethereum PoS) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but has already passed its early stages.Weight 15%About 1.3 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Security score: The security rating is high, and the code quality and security are good.Weight 35%Good (Safety Rating: Safety Rating A) · 80 / 100

Client Diversity?L2 clients lack diverse data and are usually initially centralized.Weight 20%Insufficient data (L2 characteristics) · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%No explicit deflation mechanism · 5 / 100

Inflation rate?Recently, a large number of token unlocks have led to a significant increase in circulating supply.Weight 25%High (large token unlocks) · 5 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No staking or lock-up mechanisms were found, and the lock-up ratio was zero.Weight 25%None (0%) · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap, but the total volume is relatively large.Weight 20%100 billion (with cap) · 50 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are publicly recognized and receive investment from well-known VCs.Weight 30%Clear core team (supported by well-known VCs) · 50 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Currently, the project is highly centralized and has moderate governance intensity.Weight 25%Centralized (Security score, moderate governance intensity) · 40 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financing information is disclosed, and treasury transparency is at a moderate level.Weight 25%Medium (with financing information, medium treasury transparency) · 65 / 100

Concentration of key people?Tokens can be issued additionally, with a high proportion of the top ten holders, posing risks of centralization.Weight 20%High (can be issued additionally, with a high proportion of top ten holders) · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is at a moderate level.Weight 30%Medium (DAA 65.13) · 58 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It mainly runs on the Base chain, with a limited cross-chain ecosystem.Weight 25%1 (Base) · 30 / 100

DeFi TVL?Base Chain's DeFi total locked amount is relatively high, making the ecosystem active.Weight 25%Approximately $5.65 billion (Base chain) · 70 / 100

Developer community?GitHub has no public repository, so developer activity is low.Weight 20%Slightly low (GitHub does not have a public repository) · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Tokens can be issued additionally, but there is a risk of permission leakage, and the rating is zero.Weight 25%Potential risks exist (can be issued additionally) · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The regulatory compliance score is zero, indicating significant uncertainty.Weight 30%Insufficient data (compliance score of 0) · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance is unclear, with a compliance score of zero, indicating extremely high risk.Weight 30%Insufficient data (compliance score of 0) · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of client bug frequency data and a security red line.Weight 15%Insufficient data (safety red line exists) · 0 / 100