BNB BNB
BNB leads with security compliance and roadmap delivery, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a solid D rating.
Sector Rank #157 · Global Rank #849
Overall Rating
D · 31.78 / 100BNB Overall Rating D (total 31.78), ranking high in six dimensions for security compliance, roadmap delivery, and team governance. The main point of deduction is the economic model (15 points)—mainly affected by short- and medium-term selling pressure (0 points) and value capture (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "BNB has relative advantages in security compliance, roadmap delivery, and team governance, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
24/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data makes it difficult to assess.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends have been poor, with few upgrades delivered.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 10 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100
Technical Implementation
42.25/100Consensus Mechanism?It uses a PoSA mechanism, but has a limited number of validators and a high degree of centralization.Weight 30%PoSA (Centralization) · 60 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating rich operational experience.Weight 15%About 5.7 years · 85 / 100
Recent upgrades?Recent code updates have been low in quality and core code changes, with zero effective merged PRs.Weight 35%Somewhat less · 10 / 100
Client Diversity?As a highly centralized chain, client diversity may be limited.Weight 20%to be on the low side · 40 / 100
Tokenomics
76/100Deflationary Mechanism?BNB implements a quarterly burn mechanism aimed at reducing the total supply.Weight 30%Existence (Quarterly Burn) · 70 / 100
Inflation rate?BNB has a fixed maximum supply and a burn mechanism, making it theoretically deflationary.Weight 25%Deflation · 90 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of publicly available precise data on BNB's staking or lock-up rates.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?BNB has a clear fixed supply cap, which helps stabilize its value.Weight 20%200 million (fixed) · 100 / 100
Team Governance
44.5/100Core Development Team?Binance has a large operations team, but its core development background scores low.Weight 30%The team is large and comes from diverse backgrounds · 60 / 100
Governance mechanisms?BNB Chain governance is highly centralized and mainly controlled by Binance.Weight 25%Centralization (led by Binance) · 30 / 100
Financial Transparency?Binance has reserves such as the SAFU fund, but there is a lack of transparency data on BNB Chain governance funds.Weight 25%Partially transparent · 60 / 100
Concentration of key people?As a centralized entity, Binance has a high concentration of key figures and decision-making power.Weight 20%High · 20 / 100
Market Ecosystem
34.62/100Active Address?The score for daily active addresses is low, indicating that market activity needs improvement.Weight 30%to be on the low side · 25.4 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The number of third-party integrations scores low, indicating that the scalability of the ecosystem needs improvement.Weight 25%Somewhat less · 10 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of accurate DeFi TVL data for BNB Chain.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Developer community?Binance ecosystem developer community activity is moderate, but core development activity data is limited.Weight 20%Activity level is moderate · 60 / 100
Security & Compliance
31/100Historical Major Failure?Binance has experienced hacking attacks in its history but has taken measures to respond.Weight 25%exist (once attacked) · 40 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Binance faces strict scrutiny and penalties from regulatory authorities in multiple countries worldwide.Weight 30%Prudent/controversial · 20 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC has an unfriendly attitude toward Binance and its token BNB, leading to securities disputes.Weight 30%Unfriendly (controversial) · 10 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Security Score: A higher security score indicates that client bugs may occur less frequently.Weight 15%to be on the low side · 80 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV VOOID · 33.28 | IMOD · 33.25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 31.78 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | 19.93 | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 15 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 18.27 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 59.16 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |


Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.