BounceBit BB

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public data and poor sustainability of development activities.Weight 35%Data is insufficient, and the speculation is low · 10 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends are zero, with no significant upgrades.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public data and poor sustainability of development activities.Weight 20%Data is insufficient, and there is much speculation · 15 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public data and poor sustainability of development activities.Weight 15%Data is insufficient, but speculation exists · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?It uses PoS dual-token staking combined with BTC security.Weight 30%PoS (Dual Token Staking) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time but is now running stably.Weight 15%About 2 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade quality data and sluggish development activity.Weight 35%Data is insufficient, so speculation is average · 40 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data, and new chains are usually low-profile.Weight 20%Data is insufficient, so the speculation is low · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Platform fees are used for BB buybacks, which has a deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%Platform fees will be bought back and burned · 60 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a lack of clear inflation rate data, but significant unlocking pressure exists.Weight 25%Insufficient data creates unlocking pressure · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?As a restaking chain, staking is the core, but staking rate data is not transparent.Weight 25%There is a staking mechanism, but staking rate data is insufficient · 30 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply ceiling and the total is fixed.Weight 20%2,100,000,000 BB · 100 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team has a strong background and is backed by top VCs.Weight 30%The core team has a strong background · 95 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Lack of public governance mechanisms, market data shows it is not decentralized.Weight 25%Data is insufficient and highly centralized · 70 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of details on financial transparency, but there are financing records and VC endorsements.Weight 25%Data is insufficient, but there is a record of financing · 80 / 100

Concentration of key people?The concentration of key figures is relatively low, which is beneficial for decentralization.Weight 20%to be on the low side · 90 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent, indicating high market activity.Weight 30%High activity · 100 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple chains, but the number of third-party integrations is relatively low.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment, with relatively few integrations · 60 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi has a relatively high total locked value, indicating a certain market appeal.Weight 25%Approximately $311 million · 80 / 100

Developer community?Lack of developer community data, and zero development activity trends.Weight 20%Insufficient data, low activity · 40 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are currently no major security incident records, and no safety red line has been triggered.Weight 25%&None · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory stance and uncertainty in the restaking sector.Weight 30%Data is insufficient and uncertain · 40 / 100

Sec Attitude?Without a clear SEC stance, restaking tokens may face securities identification disputes.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?It lacks data on client bug frequency, but its security score is relatively high.Weight 15%Data is insufficient, and the speculation is low · 80 / 100