Conflux CFX

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmaps and delivery records.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There have been recent upgrade announcements, but there is a lack of detailed delivery details.Weight 30%About 2 upgrades · 75 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of a public list of pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 65 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 70 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?It adopts a mature PoW consensus mechanism with high security.Weight 30%PoW (Mature) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating operational experience.Weight 15%About 5.6 years · 80 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed quality reports from recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 55 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%No explicit deflation mechanism · 80 / 100

Inflation rate?The circulating supply is close to the total supply, and the inflation rate is relatively controllable.Weight 25%Approximately 0.45% (difference between total supply and circulating supply) · 85 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of publicly available data on staking rates or hedging rates.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 75 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?PoW mechanisms usually have no strict supply cap, but issuance decreases.Weight 20%No Limit (PoW) · 70 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have excellent backgrounds and are supported by well-known investment institutions.Weight 30%The team has a strong background · 90 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Market data shows it is non-decentralized, and governance mechanisms need improvement.Weight 25%Centralized and biased · 60 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of public reporting on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 65 / 100

Concentration of key people?The core team has a moderate number of members, with risks dispersed.Weight 20%Moderate · 80 / 100

Active Address?Lack of publicly available active address data.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Limited number of ecosystem projects or missing data.Weight 25%Somewhat less · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Market data shows that non-DeFi projects may have relatively low TVL.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 65 / 100

Developer community?It has an active social media and developer community.Weight 20%Active · 80 / 100

Historical Major Failure?No major safety failures were found in the historical records.Weight 25%&None · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The regulatory environment in the region is relatively cautious, but there is specific support.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 70 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's regulatory stance on crypto assets is unclear and uncertain.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 65 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 60 / 100