Cosmos Hub ATOM

Smart Contract PlatformInfrastructure

Cosmos Hub leads with roadmap delivery and team governance, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently holding a solid C- rating.

Rating updated 2026-07-29
C-42.16 / 100

Sector Rank #108 · Global Rank #421

Roadmap Delivery89.03B+
Technical Implementation61.23D-
Tokenomics21.54F
Team Governance80.6B-
Market Ecosystem48.81F
Security & Compliance0F
01

Overall Rating

C- · 42.16 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
89.03
Technical Implementation
61.23
Tokenomics
21.54
Team Governance
80.6
Market Ecosystem
48.81
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
42.16

Cosmos Hub has an overall rating C-f C (44.14 out of 44.14), ranking highly among six dimensions in roadmap delivery, team governance, and technical implementation. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.

Rating Team Conclusion: "Cosmos Hub has relative advantages in roadmap delivery, team governance, and technical implementation, but its current shortcomings are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

54/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a clear lag in recent milestone deliveries.Weight 35%to be on the low side · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Development activity is highly sustainable, with significant recent upgrades.Weight 30%Good · 85 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There are a few important pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%6 (important) · 60 / 100

History Extension Record?Deliveries of historical milestones have been delayed.Weight 15%Exist · 40 / 100

Technical Implementation

74.5/100

Consensus Mechanism?Adopts a mature Tendermint BFT consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Tendermint BFT) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a long stable operation period and is highly experienced.Weight 15%About 7 years · 85 / 100

Recent upgrades?Code updates are of moderate quality, with few core code changes.Weight 35%Stable iteration · 65 / 100

Client Diversity?There is a lack of direct data, but the ecosystem supports diversity.Weight 20%Normal · 60 / 100

Tokenomics

32/100

Deflationary Mechanism?Currently, there is no clear deflationary mechanism, but inflation exists.Weight 30%&None · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?The community has passed a proposal to set the maximum inflation rate at 10%.Weight 25%Up to 10% · 30 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Under the PoS mechanism, the staking rate should be relatively high, and short-term unlocking pressure is low.Weight 25%Insufficient Data (PoS) · 70 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is no strict cap on token supply, and inflation mechanisms exist.Weight 20%No Upper Limit (Inflation) · 20 / 100

Team Governance

80/100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and excellent execution records.Weight 30%Experienced · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Important decisions are made through community proposals, and governance is active.Weight 25%Community governance · 80 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funding proposals and voting are highly transparent, attracting investment from well-known institutions.Weight 25%High · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?The core figures of the project have great influence, but community governance decentralizes power.Weight 20%Normal · 60 / 100

Market Ecosystem

62.5/100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is at a moderate level.Weight 30%Normal · 55 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As a blockchain internet, it possesses a large number of interconnected ecosystems.Weight 25%Many (IBC) · 90 / 100

DeFi TVL?Cosmos Hub itself is not a DeFi platform, with scattered ecosystem TVL and insufficient data.Weight 25%Insufficient data (fragmented ecosystem) · 30 / 100

Developer community?GitHub is active frequently, and the developer community is quite large.Weight 20%Active · 80 / 100

Security & Compliance

25.5/100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries the risk of additional issuance, triggering a safety red line.Weight 25%Existence (can be issued again) · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Some institutions have classified it as a potential security, and regulatory attitudes remain uncertain.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?Previewed securities by the SEC or other agencies, facing regulatory uncertainty.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 20 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?High audit coverage, active development, and low bug frequency.Weight 15%to be on the low side · 70 / 100

04

C- Peer Comparison

Export CSV
Cosmos HubC- · 42.16DODOC- · 46.61BasenjiC- · 46.54OKZOOC- · 46.47
Overall Score42.1646.6146.5446.47
Roadmap Delivery89.0303037.5
Technical Implementation61.23------
Tokenomics21.5466.7924.531.07
Team Governance80.690.3751.656.4
Market Ecosystem48.8191.655.0167.44
Security & Compliance0060.4560.5

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions