crvUSD CRVUSD

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of recent milestone delivery data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery data, low development activity trend.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public information on pending delivery milestones makes it impossible to conduct assessments.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a stablecoin, its security inherits from the underlying public chain.Weight 30%Reliance on underlying chain consensus (PoS/PoA) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project has been running for a relatively short time but has been running stably for nearly three years.Weight 15%About 2.8 years · 75 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed data on the quality of recent upgrades, making it impossible to assess.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?As a stablecoin, it does not involve client diversity.Weight 20%Not applicable (stablecoin) · 70 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear data on deflationary mechanisms, and the strength of demand logic is low.Weight 30%Insufficient data / unclear mechanisms · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Contracts carry the risk of additional issuance, which could lead to unlimited inflation.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up rate is extremely low, lacking effective staking or lock-up data.Weight 25%Extremely low / insufficient data · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Contracts can be issued additionally without a strict supply cap, which carries risks.Weight 20%No Hard Limit (Can Be Issued Again) · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team background and entrepreneurial experience are scored lower.Weight 30%General background · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The governance mechanism is highly authentic and is conducted through a DAO.Weight 25%Good (DAO Governance) · 84 / 100

Financial Transparency?Proposal voting and financial transparency are high.Weight 25%High · 84 / 100

Concentration of key people?Administrator address types have low scores, posing the risk of single-point control.Weight 20%There is a concentration risk · 25 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is average and needs improvement.Weight 30%Moderately low · 47.05 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream chains, offering high cross-chain integration.Weight 25%9 chains · 90 / 100

DeFi TVL?As a stablecoin, its market capitalization and usage in DeFi are moderate.Weight 25%Approximately $200 million (crvUSD market cap) · 27 / 100

Developer community?Developer activity trend scores are extremely low, and community activity is insufficient.Weight 20%Low activity · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries the risk of additional issuance, posing a significant security hazard.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Stablecoins face increasingly stringent global regulatory scrutiny, creating uncertainty.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's regulatory stance on stablecoins remains unclear and controversial.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?As a stablecoin, it does not involve the frequency of client bugs.Weight 15%Not applicable (stablecoin) · 0 / 100