Curve DAO CRV

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of near-term roadmap delivery data and low development continuity scores.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent specific upgrade delivery data.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of clear historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a DEX, it relies on PoS consensus from underlying chains like Ethereum.Weight 30%Dependency on the underlying chain (PoS) · 80 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project has been online since August 2020 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%About 6 years · 90 / 100

Recent upgrades?There has been a recent upgrade in the tokenomics cycle, but technical details remain unclear.Weight 35%Token economic cycle upgrade · 60 / 100

Client Diversity?As a DEX, client diversity depends on the underlying chain it deploys.Weight 20%Depends on the underlying chain · 70 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of effective value capture and deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%There is no direct deflationary mechanism · 5 / 100

Inflation rate?Weak value capture ability, and the effectiveness of inflation management is questionable.Weight 25%Inflation persists, but emissions decrease · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of clear data, but the concentration of shares is high.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%3,030,303,031 CRV · 100 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have relatively low background scores and are relatively small in scale.Weight 30%The core team is relatively small in size · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Using Snapshot for off-chain governance results in high authenticity scores.Weight 25%Snapshot off-chain governance · 89 / 100

Financial Transparency?Proposal voting and transparency of the treasury scored high.Weight 25%Relatively high · 89 / 100

Concentration of key people?The contract grants minting rights, and the authority concentration score is relatively low.Weight 20%There is minting rights, with high concentration · 30 / 100

Active Address?High daily active addresses score well, indicating good user activity.Weight 30%Relatively high · 86.4 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream L1 and L2 networks.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment (15+) · 95 / 100

DeFi TVL?The protocol's total value locked is high, demonstrating its significant position in the DeFi sector.Weight 25%Approximately $1.95 billion · 90 / 100

Developer community?Lack of developer community activity data, low development activity trend scores.Weight 20%Insufficient data, low development activity · 5 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Multiple major security incidents in history have caused financial losses.Weight 25%Repeatedly attacked, resulting in financial losses · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, and regulatory attitudes in the DeFi sector are unfriendly.Weight 30%Too cautious/unfriendly · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on DeFi projects is unclear, posing risks of being classified as securities.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?The contract carries minting rights, posing a serious risk of permission leakage.Weight 15%There is a risk of privilege leakage · 0 / 100