Ether.fi ETHFI

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of clear public roadmaps and delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of publicly available records of recent technology upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There are operational and financial milestones, with fewer technical ones.Weight 20%There are operational milestones · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical records of project delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?The protocol is based on Ethereum's PoS mechanism, offering high security.Weight 30%PoS (Ethereum-dependent) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time, accumulating some experience.Weight 15%About 3 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgrade details and quality assessment data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?Relying on Ethereum's client diversity and solid foundation.Weight 20%Rely on Ethereum diversity · 85 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Protocol revenue is used for token buybacks, but its value capture capability is weak.Weight 30%There is a buyback and destruction mechanism · 20 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a token unlock plan, and there is high inflationary pressure in the short term.Weight 25%Existence unlocks and releases · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?TVL is huge, but token value capture is insufficient.Weight 25%TVL far exceeds market value · 50 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply, and the total supply is controllable.Weight 20%1 billion units · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have transparent backgrounds and are backed by well-known VCs.Weight 30%The team has a strong background · 80 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are developing, with a safety score of moderate.Weight 25%Gradual decentralization · 75 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financing information is disclosed, and capital transparency is good.Weight 25%Good financial transparency · 75 / 100

Concentration of key people?Lower concentration of permissions reduces single-point risk.Weight 20%Low concentration of permissions · 80 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is moderate, with growth potential.Weight 30%Activity level is moderate · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on multiple mainstream chains, with good ecosystem scalability.Weight 25%4. Chains · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?TVL is huge, and the market is highly recognized.Weight 25%Approximately 3.4 billion USD · 90 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are risks of backdoor code and permission leakage, triggering red lines.Weight 25%There is a safety red line · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The regulatory environment for DeFi and staking is complex and full of uncertainty.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC takes a cautious stance toward DeFi and staked tokens.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100