EURC EURC

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of publicly available recent milestone data, making accurate assessment impossible.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity and upgrade records are inactive.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of historical roadmap delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Relying on consensus mechanisms across multiple mature public chains, it offers high security.Weight 30%PoS (Multi-chain) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The token has a relatively short issuance history but relies on mature public blockchains.Weight 15%About 3.5 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of specific information about recent upgrades to token contracts.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?The underlying public blockchains it relies on, such as Ethereum, have good client diversity.Weight 20%Good (relies on underlying public blockchain) · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?As a stablecoin, it has no built-in deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Supply is dynamically adjusted according to euro reserves, aiming to remain stable.Weight 25%Dynamic Adjustment (Anchored to the Euro) · 80 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Stablecoins typically do not have staking or lock-up mechanisms.Weight 25%&None · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is no fixed supply limit, dynamically adjusted according to market demand and reserves.Weight 20%No limit (dynamic adjustment) · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Issued by the well-known organization Circle, but the core members' backgrounds score is relatively low.Weight 30%Renowned Institutions (Circle) · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance is concentrated in the issuer Circle, lacking a decentralized mechanism.Weight 25%Centralized Governance · 20 / 100

Financial Transparency?Issuers regularly publish reserve audit reports, offering high transparency.Weight 25%Good (Periodic Audit) · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?Decision-making power is concentrated in a few key figures, posing risks of centralization.Weight 20%High · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is strong, and the user base remains stable.Weight 30%Good · 78.5 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on multiple mainstream public chains, with good cross-chain liquidity.Weight 25%6 chains · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Its market cap is medium, holding a certain share in the DeFi ecosystem.Weight 25%Approximately $435 million (market capitalization) · 60 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries risks of backdoor code and permission leakage.Weight 25%There are potential risks · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, with significant compliance risks.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Stablecoins face strict SEC scrutiny and low compliance scores.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?The contract carries risks of backdoor code and permission leakage.Weight 15%There are serious vulnerabilities · 0 / 100