Fogo FOGO

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?The project started relatively quickly, with early milestones completed on schedule.Weight 35%High · 85 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?The project's mainnet has just gone live and lacks recent upgrade data.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmaps for future development.Weight 20%not specified · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?The project has a relatively short history and currently has no publicly disclosed major delay records.Weight 15%&None · 90 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?It adopts an SVM-based PoS mechanism, offering high performance potential.Weight 30%PoS (SVM) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a short runtime and insufficient historical data accumulation.Weight 15%About 0.4 years · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?The mainnet will launch in January 2026 and is currently operating stably.Weight 35%The mainnet just launched · 70 / 100

Client Diversity?It mainly relies on the Firedancer client, and its diversity needs improvement.Weight 20%Slightly less (mainly relies on Firedancer) · 60 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of public, explicit deflationary mechanism design.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 50 / 100

Inflation rate?There are regular token unlocks, which put inflationary pressure on circulating supply.Weight 25%Existence of continuous unlocking (about 3.4% / year) · 55 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of publicly available data on staking rates or hedging rates.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a total supply, but no explicit statement of a hard top.Weight 20%About 10 billion (soft top) · 70 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, and possess relevant experience.Weight 30%Open and experienced · 80 / 100

Governance mechanisms?There is a lack of public, detailed governance mechanisms, and the degree of decentralization needs improvement.Weight 25%Unclear (high degree of centralization) · 45 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financing information is open and transparent, supported by well-known investment institutions.Weight 25%High ($20.5 million raised publicly) · 85 / 100

Concentration of key people?The core team member concentration is moderate, with some risks but manageable.Weight 20%Normal · 70 / 100

Active Address?Lack of publicly available active address data.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?As a new L1, the ecosystem is still in the early stages of construction.Weight 25%Insufficient Data (L1) · 55 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of public DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Developer community?Github activity data is missing, but project data shows some community attention.Weight 20%Medium (Missing Github data, but still concerned by the community) · 65 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The project has a relatively short history and currently has no publicly disclosed records of major safety incidents.Weight 25%&None · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?As an L1 blockchain project, it faces a neutral and somewhat cautious regulatory environment.Weight 30%Neutral and cautious · 60 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC is disputed over the securities attributes of L1 tokens, with no clear statement at present.Weight 30%Disputed (Presumed Non-Security) · 60 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?The project's mainnet had just gone live and lacked data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100