Gate GT

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?The lack of publicly available near-term roadmap delivery data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recently, protocol layer upgrade activity has been minimal, with the main focus being on exchange business.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available and trackable pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical delay records, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?It adopts a mature PoS consensus mechanism and is compatible with EVM, lowering the barrier for developers.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running stably for over six years, accumulating considerable operational experience.Weight 15%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of public information and code activity regarding recent upgrades to the GateChain protocol layer.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?There is a lack of public data on the diversity of GateChain clients.Weight 20%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a token burn mechanism, but its strength rating is zero, so its effectiveness may be poor.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Inflation rate?There is uncirculated supply, and short-term unlocking pressure is high, which may lead to inflation.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public staking rate data, and the contract shows no holders locked in the contract.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%90 / 100 · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Team members come from diverse backgrounds but lack public information and activity of the core development team.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The governance mechanism is relatively centralized, but the safety score evaluates governance intensity decently.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100

Financial Transparency?The transparency of funds is rated as moderate, and the exchange regularly publishes reserve reports.Weight 25%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contracts have hidden owners, with key figures highly concentrated in power and a single point of risk.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Active Address?The extremely low number of active addresses indicates insufficient on-chain user engagement.Weight 30%5 / 100 · 5 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Despite the presence of Gate Layer, the number of third-party integrations is zero, and ecosystem development is slow.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lacking DeFi TVL data for GateChain, it is speculated that the ecosystem's TVL is relatively low.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Developer community?The GitHub repository is empty, and developer community activity is extremely low.Weight 20%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The exchange has suffered major attacks, but there are no publicly disclosed major faults at the GateChain protocol level.Weight 25%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Exchanges are actively obtaining regulatory licenses, but token contracts carry high-risk characteristics, and regulatory attitudes may be more cautious.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Sec Attitude?The characteristics of token contracts and the background of centralized exchanges may be presumed by the SEC as securities.Weight 30%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100