Global Dollar USDG

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available recent milestone data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of publicly available details about recent upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a stablecoin, it relies on the underlying chain's consensus mechanism.Weight 30%Dependency on the underlying chain (PoS/PoA) · 80 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a short runtime and limited historical data.Weight 15%About 1.6 years · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?The number of code updates and valid merge requests is relatively low.Weight 35%The quality is average · 15 / 100

Client Diversity?As a token, there is no independent client diversity indicator.Weight 20%Not applicable (tokens) · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?As stablecoins, they do not have deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%None (Stablecoin Features) · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Supply dynamically adjusts according to market demand to maintain anchorage.Weight 25%Dynamic adjustment (1:1 anchoring) · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?As a stablecoin, it does not offer staking or lock-up mechanisms.Weight 25%No staking/lock-up · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Supply is dynamically adjusted according to market demand with no fixed upper limit.Weight 20%No limit (dynamic minting/burning) · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team background and execution record scores are relatively low.Weight 30%Moderate team background · 20 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are highly transparent but lack decentralized governance.Weight 25%Governance transparency is acceptable · 79 / 100

Financial Transparency?Transparency in fund usage is high, but there is no public financing information.Weight 25%Fund-making transparency is acceptable · 79 / 100

Concentration of key people?There is a risk of permission leakage, with a high concentration of key individuals.Weight 20%There is a concentration risk · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is average and needs improvement.Weight 30%There are relatively few active addresses · 40 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed on multiple chains, but with low cross-chain interoperability scores.Weight 25%4. Chains · 50 / 100

DeFi TVL?TVL on X Layer is relatively low.Weight 25%Approximately $18.89 million (X Layer) · 30 / 100

Developer community?There are few GitHub repositories, and the number of stars and branches is low.Weight 20%The community is relatively small in scale · 20 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries risks of backdoor code and permission leakage.Weight 25%Backdoor code/permission leakage exists · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Regulated in Singapore, but overall compliance scores are extremely low.Weight 30%Singapore is regulated-friendly · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Issuers have historical disputes with the SEC, resulting in low compliance scores.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?As a token, there is no independent client bug frequency indicator.Weight 15%Not applicable (tokens) · 0 / 100