Hashflow HFT

Ethereum EcosystemDeFiDEXLayerzero ecosystem

Hashflow leads in market ecosystem and team governance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding a C+ rating.

Rating updated 2026-07-28
C+59.65 / 100

Sector Rank #37 · Global Rank #193

Roadmap Delivery37.5F
Technical Implementation----
Tokenomics35F
Team Governance73.37C-
Market Ecosystem90.7A-
Security & Compliance56.17E
01

Overall Rating

C+ · 59.65 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
35
Team Governance
73.37
Market Ecosystem
90.7
Security & Compliance
56.17
Overall Score
59.65

Hashflow has an overall rating C+f C (total score 58.39), ranking high in market ecosystem, team governance, and security compliance across six dimensions. The main deductible points are in the economic model (35 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and value capture (0 points).

Rating Team Conclusion: "Hashflow has relative advantages in market ecosystem, team governance, and security compliance, but its current weaknesses are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

39/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available near-term roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of clear delivery records for nearly four upgrades.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There is a clear future integration plan.Weight 20%Integrated Monad (Q4 2025) · 60 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Technical Implementation

57.5/100

Consensus Mechanism?As a DEX, it relies on mature underlying chain consensus.Weight 30%Dependence on underlying chains (PoS/PoSA) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The main network of the project has been operating stably for several years.Weight 15%About 3.5 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of specific quality information about recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Client Diversity?As a DEX, this metric does not apply directly.Weight 20%Not applicable (DEX) · 60 / 100

Tokenomics

32.5/100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear token deflationary mechanism was found.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There are regular token unlocks, leading to increased circulation.Weight 25%There is unlocking inflation · 30 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public staking or lock-up data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?The token supply has a clear hard top.Weight 20%1 billion (hardtop) · 100 / 100

Team Governance

79/100

Core Development Team?Core team members are open and transparent, with clear backgrounds.Weight 30%The core team is open and transparent · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Safety scoring shows a sound governance mechanism.Weight 25%Presence (Security Score 87.25) · 87 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financing information is disclosed, and the funds are highly transparent.Weight 25%High (Project data: 28.2 million) · 87 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contract ownership is concentrated at a single address.Weight 20%Existence (Single Address Ownership) · 50 / 100

Market Ecosystem

60.7/100

Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well.Weight 30%High (score 89.15) · 89 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains and L2s.Weight 25%Multi-chain deployment (7+) · 90 / 100

DeFi TVL?The total value locked in the project is relatively low.Weight 25%Approximately $577,000 · 30 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community active data.Weight 20%Insufficient data (missing GitHub) · 20 / 100

Security & Compliance

36.5/100

Historical Major Failure?There was a hacker attack incident that caused losses.Weight 25%Existence (Hack in June 2023) · 20 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Decentralized exchanges face regulatory uncertainty.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 40 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on DEXs and related tokens remains unclear.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 40 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?As a DEX, this metric is not directly applicable and data is missing.Weight 15%Insufficient data (not applicable) · 50 / 100

04

C+ Peer Comparison

Export CSV
HashflowC+ · 59.65xDollar StablecoinC+ · 59.88PixelsC+ · 59.72MagicCraftC+ · 59.54
Overall Score59.6559.8859.7259.54
Roadmap Delivery37.556.6137.530
Technical Implementation--60.25----
Tokenomics3564.153548.58
Team Governance73.3758.8487.4371.28
Market Ecosystem90.762.276.1279.54
Security & Compliance56.1756.9261.8760

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions