Circle USYC USYC

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of roadmap and on-time data delivery makes assessment impossible.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent upgrade delivery data is missing and cannot be evaluated.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of pending delivery milestone information makes it impossible to assess.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of delays, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?USYC is a token with no native consensus mechanism and relies on the underlying chain.Weight 30%None (token) · 0 / 100

Main network years of operation?Released in December 2024, it has a relatively short runtime.Weight 15%About 1.5 years · 30 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of token contract upgrade information makes it impossible to assess upgrade quality.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?USYC is a token with no client-side diversity concept.Weight 20%Not applicable (tokens) · 0 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?As stablecoins, the supply is controlled by the issuer, but the chips are highly concentrated.Weight 25%Stablecoins, issued under controlled control · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No token staking or lock-up mechanisms have been found.Weight 25%0% · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Supply is linked to reserves, but chips are highly concentrated, posing risks.Weight 20%Approximately 2.64 billion · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team has some background, but its scale and influence are limited.Weight 30%Medium-sized with a good background · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are moderately transparent, but decision-making power is highly concentrated.Weight 25%Centralized governance with high concentration · 68 / 100

Financial Transparency?Transparency of funds is moderate and needs further improvement.Weight 25%Medium transparency · 68 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses hold 100% of the tokens, indicating a very high concentration.Weight 20%Extremely high concentration · 0 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is extremely low, and user engagement is insufficient.Weight 30%Very few (0.08) · 0.08 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on multiple mainstream chains, providing a certain foundation for cross-chain liquidity.Weight 25%3 (ETH, BSC, Solana) · 30 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of token staking data in DeFi, and low third-party integration.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Developer community?Lack of developer community activity data and low third-party integration.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Backdoor code and permission leaks trigger a security red line.Weight 25%Backdoor code and permission leaks exist · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There are serious safety issues, and regulators may take a cautious approach.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?There are serious security concerns, and the SEC may take a cautious approach.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Audit coverage is high, but critical security vulnerabilities still exist.Weight 15%Audit coverage rate: 85% · 85 / 100