Highstreet HIGH

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmaps, and inferences are made based on execution scores.Weight 35%Data is insufficient, about moderate · 61.1 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of specific delivery information for recent upgrades.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 55 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public information about pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 55 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of historical deferral records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 55 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on mature PoS chains, it offers high security.Weight 30%Relies on underlying PoS chains · 75 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project has been in operation for a long time, accumulating some experience.Weight 15%About 4.5 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of publicly available information on the latest upgrade quality.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 43.6 / 100

Client Diversity?As a token project, client diversity depends on the underlying public chain.Weight 20%Depends on the underlying chain · 60 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 40 / 100

Inflation rate?The total amount is fixed and the unlock plan is transparent, keeping inflationary pressures under control.Weight 25%Fixed limit, controllable unlocking available · 85 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public data, but the project ecosystem may have hidden hedging.Weight 25%Data is insufficient, but the speculation is good · 78 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Having a clear supply cap helps stabilize value.Weight 20%100 million (fixed) · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are open and have clear backgrounds.Weight 30%The core team is open and transparent · 80 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The governance mechanism is relatively centralized, but the safety rating is acceptable.Weight 25%Centralized governance, with a moderate safety rating · 65 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financing information is disclosed, with investments from well-known institutions.Weight 25%Financing information is open and transparent · 85 / 100

Concentration of key people?Lack of data on key figures holding coins or voting power concentration.Weight 20%Data is insufficient, speculation is moderate · 55.95 / 100

Active Address?There is a lack of direct data, but the type of project and attention suggest it is certainly active.Weight 30%Insufficient data, speculating good activity · 75 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream public chains with good scalability.Weight 25%2 (Ethereum, BNB Chain) · 75 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not DeFi-related, so TVL data is not applicable.Weight 25%Non-DeFi projects with insufficient data · 50 / 100

Developer community?There is a lack of public data, but the project's continued development requires developer support.Weight 20%Data is insufficient, speculation is moderate · 65 / 100

Historical Major Failure?No publicly disclosed major safety accident records have been found.Weight 25%No major public accidents · 80 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Metaverse token regulation remains unclear and uncertain.Weight 30%Neutral and cautious · 62 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC strictly determines the securities attributes of tokens, which carries risks.Weight 30%Neutral and cautious · 62 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of direct data, but the safety rating provides a reference.Weight 15%Data is insufficient, speculation is moderate · 70 / 100