Invesco QQQ ETF (Ondo Tokenized ETF) QQQON

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and delivery records makes it impossible to assess.Weight 35%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade information makes it impossible to assess delivery status.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of delays, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a tokenized asset, it relies on the PoSA consensus of the underlying chain BNB Smart Chain.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project has been online for a short time and lacks mainnet operation experience.Weight 15%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available information on recent upgrades, making it impossible to assess quality.Weight 35%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?As tokenized assets, it relies on the client-side diversity of the underlying chain.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?As an RWA token, it has no native deflation mechanism.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Supply is linked to the underlying ETF assets, with no fixed inflation rate.Weight 25%60 / 100 · 60 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?As an RWA token, it does not have staking or lock-up mechanisms.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?The supply is linked to the underlying ETF assets, with no fixed supply cap.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Core Development Team?Lack of public information and background on the core development team.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?As a tokenized ETF, it is centrally managed by the issuer.Weight 25%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of on-chain fund transparency data, but as ETFs it is subject to traditional regulation.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Concentration of key people?There are risks of agency contracts and permission leaks, with a high concentration of key personnel.Weight 20%5 / 100 · 5 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is moderate, indicating a certain level of user engagement.Weight 30%61 / 100 · 60.7 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream blockchains, expanding ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?It lacks DeFi TVL data for the token itself, but benefits from the underlying chain ecosystem.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Developer community?As an RWA token, it lacks an independent developer community.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are proxy contracts and permission leaks, with extremely high security risks.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?As an RWA token, it faces increasingly stringent regulatory scrutiny in the crypto space.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on RWA tokens remains unclear, with regulatory uncertainty.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Token contracts have proxy and permission issues, posing high security vulnerabilities.Weight 15%5 / 100 · 5 / 100