Jupiter JUP

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap milestone delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Several important features have recently been launched and proposals have been approved.Weight 30%Continuously delivering new features and proposals · 80 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There are pending proposals, and some airdrop plans have been postponed.Weight 20%There are pending proposals and delayed plans · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?The Jupuary airdrop plan has been postponed indefinitely.Weight 15%There are recent records of airdrop delays · 40 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a Solana ecosystem project, it inherits its mature consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoH + PoS (Solana) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The main network of the project has a relatively short operating time but remains active.Weight 15%About 2 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Recently, there have been several important product and feature upgrades.Weight 35%Continuously launching new products and features · 85 / 100

Client Diversity?As an aggregator, it integrates multiple liquidity sources within the Solana ecosystem.Weight 20%Aggregate multi-party liquidity · 70 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The agreement fee buyback and burn mechanism has been approved, and the proposal to reduce net release to zero has been approved.Weight 30%Protocol fee buyback and burning, net release dropped to zero · 90 / 100

Inflation rate?The DAO has passed a proposal aimed at reducing future net token release to zero.Weight 25%The goal is zero net inflation · 95 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a staking mechanism, but public staking rate data is insufficient.Weight 25%There is a staking mechanism, but specific ratio data is insufficient · 50 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%10 billion units · 100 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are public, but the model scores their backgrounds low.Weight 30%Core team is public, background score is relatively low · 60 / 100

Governance mechanisms?DAO governance is active, but the security score shows low governance intensity.Weight 25%Active DAO governance, but centralization risks remain to be assessed · 65 / 100

Financial Transparency?Initial financing information was public, but the fund usage transparency model scored low.Weight 25%Initial financing information was public, but the score for transparency in fund usage was low · 55 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten non-treasury addresses have a holding ratio as high as 100%, posing a high concentration risk.Weight 20%The top ten non-treasury addresses are highly concentrated in holdings · 0 / 100

Active Address?The daily active address count scores are average, with room for improvement.Weight 30%The number of active addresses is moderate · 45 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed in the Solana ecosystem, with limited cross-chain integration.Weight 25%Mainly in the Solana ecosystem · 60 / 100

DeFi TVL?The total value locked in the protocol is relatively high, reflecting market recognition.Weight 25%Approximately $2.15 billion · 85 / 100

Developer community?There is a lack of publicly available data on GitHub developer activity, making it difficult to assess.Weight 20%Lack of publicly available developer activity data · 30 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are serious security risks such as backdoor code and permission leaks.Weight 25%There are risks of backdoor code and permission leakage · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is regulatory uncertainty regarding DEX aggregators.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 20 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC takes a cautious stance toward DEXs and related tokens.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 20 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100