LAB LAB
LAB leads in market ecosystem and security compliance, with economic models remaining the main focus, currently holding a C- rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-02
C-44.1 / 100
Sector Rank #110 · Global Rank #353
Overall Rating
C- · 44.1 / 100Roadmap Delivery
37.5
Tokenomics
0
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
68
Security & Compliance
64.35
Overall Score
44.1
LAB has an overall rating C-f C (total 44.1), ranking highly in six dimensions for market ecosystem, security compliance, and roadmap delivery. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
The rating team concluded: "LAB has relative advantages in market ecosystem, security compliance, and roadmap delivery, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in the economic model." " It is recommended to observe small positions and wait for key sub-sectors to improve before increasing allocation weighting.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
35/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends are zero, with insufficient deliveries.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
55.5/100Consensus Mechanism?It adopts a mature PoSA mechanism, balancing performance and decentralization.Weight 30%PoSA (Proven) · 85 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a short runtime and limited historical data.Weight 15%About 0.5 years · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of client diversity data, speculating that diversity is limited.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 40 / 100
Tokenomics
20/100Deflationary Mechanism?There is a buyback mechanism, but it is insufficient to offset the risk of token concentration.Weight 30%Existence (Buyback) · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?The lack of clear inflation rate data means there is significant pressure to unlock in the future.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of staking or lock-up rate data leads to high liquidity concentration.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to value stability.Weight 20%1 billion (hardtop) · 100 / 100
Team Governance
26/100Core Development Team?The core team has limited public information and low development activity.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project is highly centralized and lacks decentralized governance.Weight 25%Centralised · 10 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of detailed information on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Concentration of key people?Tokens are highly concentrated in a few addresses, posing centralization risks.Weight 20%High · 10 / 100
Market Ecosystem
49.5/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%High · 100 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed on a single chain, with limited cross-chain and integration.Weight 25%Single (BSc) · 20 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
62.5/100Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%&None · 100 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory attitude information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Sec Attitude?Lack of clear SEC stance information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
C- Peer Comparison
Export CSV| LABC- · 44.1 |  DODOC- · 46.61 |  BasenjiC- · 46.54 |  OKZOOC- · 46.47 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 44.1 | 46.61 | 46.54 | 46.47 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 0 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 66.79 | 24.53 | 1.07 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 90.37 | 51.6 | 56.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 68 | 91.6 | 55.01 | 67.44 |
| Security & Compliance | 64.35 | 0 | 60.45 | 60.5 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.