Linea LINEA
Linea leads in team governance and market ecosystem performance, with roadmap delivery remaining a key focus, currently holding a D rating.
Rating updated 2026-07-29
D30.37 / 100
Sector Rank #168 · Global Rank #928
Overall Rating
D · 30.37 / 100Roadmap Delivery
0
Tokenomics
46.67
Team Governance
64.29
Market Ecosystem
54.06
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
30.37
Linea has an overall rating Df D (total 29.61), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is roadmap delivery (0 points)—mainly affected by sub-items such as development continuity (0 points) and development heat trends (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Linea has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in roadmap delivery." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public pending delivery milestones.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
67.25/100Consensus Mechanism?As a zk-rollup, it is currently controlled by ConsenSys.Weight 30%PoA (Centralized) / zk-rollup · 60 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been operating stably since its launch in July 2023.Weight 15%About 3 years · 75 / 100
Recent upgrades?The recent upgrade introduced dual-token burning, which benefits the economic model.Weight 35%Dual-Currency Burn Mechanism (2025-11) · 80 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of public data on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
61/100Deflationary Mechanism?Transaction gas fees proportionally burn ETH and LINEA.Weight 30%Dual-currency burn mechanism · 85 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a large number of uncirculated tokens, and future unlocking pressure is significant.Weight 25%There is an unlocking and additional release · 40 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public data on token staking or locking.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Tokens have a clear fixed supply cap.Weight 20%72.01 billion (fixed) · 90 / 100
Team Governance
55/100Core Development Team?The core team comes from ConsenSys and is highly experienced.Weight 30%ConsenSys (Renowned Team) · 90 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project is currently led by ConsenSys and lacks sufficient decentralization.Weight 25%Centralization (led by ConsenSys) · 30 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of publicly available data on fund transparency.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Concentration of key people?The project is led by ConsenSys and carries concentration risk.Weight 20%Higher (led by ConsenSys) · 40 / 100
Market Ecosystem
51.33/100Active Address?The number of on-chain active addresses performed well.Weight 30%High activity · 86.1 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?There are few third-party integrations, and the ecosystem is still in its early stages.Weight 25%Somewhat less · 10 / 100
DeFi TVL?TVL is decent but still lags behind the leading L2s.Weight 25%Approximately $159 million · 60 / 100
Developer community?High social media attention, but lack data on developer activity.Weight 20%Active communities, but insufficient developer data · 40 / 100
Security & Compliance
12.5/100Historical Major Failure?In September 2025, there was a network outage, which was later fixed.Weight 25%Experienced downtime (2025-09) · 50 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of regulatory attitude information at project locations.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?Lack of clear stance from the SEC on its tokens.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?There is a risk of backdoor code and permission leakage.Weight 15%There is a risk of backdoor code · 0 / 100
D Peer Comparison
Export CSV| LineaD · 30.37 |  VOOID · 33.28 |  ColonyD · 33.27 |  IMOD · 33.25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 30.37 | 33.28 | 33.27 | 33.25 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 0 | 37.5 | 11.25 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 46.67 | 0 | 3.58 | 29.52 |
| Team Governance | 64.29 | 95.96 | 86.63 | 44 |
| Market Ecosystem | 54.06 | 66.15 | 18.32 | 6.96 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 52.51 | 50.06 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.