MAGA TRUMP

Ethereum EcosystemCharityBNB Chain EcosystemMemeBase EcosystemPolitiFiMade in USABase Native

Thanks to its strong team governance and market ecosystem performance, MAGA remains a key focus on security and compliance, currently holding a solid D- rating.

Rating updated 2026-08-01
D-26.54 / 100

Sector Rank #598 · Global Rank #1201

Roadmap Delivery11.25F
Technical Implementation----
Tokenomics33.5F
Team Governance54E
Market Ecosystem47.87F
Security & Compliance0F
01

Overall Rating

D- · 26.54 / 100
Roadmap Delivery
11.25
Tokenomics
33.5
Team Governance
54
Market Ecosystem
47.87
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
26.54

MAGA overall rating D- (total 26.54), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.

Rating Team Conclusion: "MAGA has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic modeling, but its current shortcomings are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.

02

Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown

Roadmap Delivery

7.75/100

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap and delivery records.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?The project lacks active development and has no recent upgrade records.Weight 30%No recent upgrades · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%No public milestones · 10 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of a public roadmap, making it impossible to assess historical delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 15 / 100

Technical Implementation

53/100

Consensus Mechanism?Inherited from mature PoS public chains, offering high security.Weight 30%PoS (inherited from the underlying chain) · 80 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project has a short runtime but is already present in the market.Weight 15%About 2.5 years · 70 / 100

Recent upgrades?As a meme coin, the project itself has no technical upgrades.Weight 35%No significant escalations · 10 / 100

Client Diversity?Clients that rely on the underlying public blockchain.Weight 20%Inheriting the diversity of underlying chains · 75 / 100

Tokenomics

28/100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflationary mechanism has been found.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There is an uncirculated portion that may lead to slight inflation.Weight 25%There is a small amount of potential inflation · 40 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No significant staking or lock-up mechanisms were found.Weight 25%Very Low · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply ceiling and the total is fixed.Weight 20%47 million (fixed) · 90 / 100

Team Governance

46.5/100

Core Development Team?Core team information is not transparent, lacking public background.Weight 30%Anonymous/Opaque · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are centralized, and community participation is limited.Weight 25%Centralized/Limited · 40 / 100

Financial Transparency?There is a certain degree of transparency in the flow of funds, but there are large transfers.Weight 25%Acceptable · 70 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten holdings have a high concentration of token-holding addresses.Weight 20%Higher (15.5%) · 50 / 100

Market Ecosystem

37.24/100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is moderate, and user engagement is average.Weight 30%Average performance · 65.8 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains, with cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%4 (Base, ETH, BSC, Solana) · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project itself lacks a DeFi ecosystem, so TVL is negligible.Weight 25%Very low/none · 0 / 100

Developer community?Lack of open developer communities and activity.Weight 20%Extremely inactive · 0 / 100

Security & Compliance

22.5/100

Historical Major Failure?There were backdoor code and permission leaks, and large withdrawals occurred.Weight 25%There are backdoor codes, permission leaks, and large withdrawals · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Meme coins often face regulatory cautiousness and insufficient data.Weight 30%Biased caution / insufficient data · 20 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC takes a cautious stance on most tokens, with securities disputes ahead.Weight 30%There is controversy and insufficient data · 20 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Client stability relies on the underlying public blockchain.Weight 15%Inheriting the stability of the underlying chain · 70 / 100

04

D- Peer Comparison

Export CSV
MAGAD- · 26.54RogueD- · 26.66GaiAID- · 26.65Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64
Overall Score26.5426.6626.6526.64
Roadmap Delivery11.2537.537.537.5
Technical Implementation--------
Tokenomics33.5000
Team Governance54305670.72
Market Ecosystem47.879.6359.9851.84
Security & Compliance051.7500

Discussion · Comments

Me
Replying to @User
0/800

No comments yet.

Notifications

Sign in to view messages
View all messagesManage subscriptions