
MAGA TRUMP
Thanks to its strong team governance and market ecosystem performance, MAGA remains a key focus on security and compliance, currently holding a solid D- rating.
Sector Rank #598 · Global Rank #1201
Overall Rating
D- · 26.54 / 100MAGA overall rating D- (total 26.54), ranking high in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic model across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "MAGA has relative advantages in team governance, market ecosystem, and economic modeling, but its current shortcomings are mainly in security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
7.75/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap and delivery records.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 10 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?The project lacks active development and has no recent upgrade records.Weight 30%No recent upgrades · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%No public milestones · 10 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of a public roadmap, making it impossible to assess historical delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 15 / 100
Technical Implementation
53/100Consensus Mechanism?Inherited from mature PoS public chains, offering high security.Weight 30%PoS (inherited from the underlying chain) · 80 / 100
Main network years of operation?The project has a short runtime but is already present in the market.Weight 15%About 2.5 years · 70 / 100
Recent upgrades?As a meme coin, the project itself has no technical upgrades.Weight 35%No significant escalations · 10 / 100
Client Diversity?Clients that rely on the underlying public blockchain.Weight 20%Inheriting the diversity of underlying chains · 75 / 100
Tokenomics
28/100Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflationary mechanism has been found.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?There is an uncirculated portion that may lead to slight inflation.Weight 25%There is a small amount of potential inflation · 40 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No significant staking or lock-up mechanisms were found.Weight 25%Very Low · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply ceiling and the total is fixed.Weight 20%47 million (fixed) · 90 / 100
Team Governance
46.5/100Core Development Team?Core team information is not transparent, lacking public background.Weight 30%Anonymous/Opaque · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are centralized, and community participation is limited.Weight 25%Centralized/Limited · 40 / 100
Financial Transparency?There is a certain degree of transparency in the flow of funds, but there are large transfers.Weight 25%Acceptable · 70 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten holdings have a high concentration of token-holding addresses.Weight 20%Higher (15.5%) · 50 / 100
Market Ecosystem
37.24/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is moderate, and user engagement is average.Weight 30%Average performance · 65.8 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains, with cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%4 (Base, ETH, BSC, Solana) · 70 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project itself lacks a DeFi ecosystem, so TVL is negligible.Weight 25%Very low/none · 0 / 100
Developer community?Lack of open developer communities and activity.Weight 20%Extremely inactive · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
22.5/100Historical Major Failure?There were backdoor code and permission leaks, and large withdrawals occurred.Weight 25%There are backdoor codes, permission leaks, and large withdrawals · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Meme coins often face regulatory cautiousness and insufficient data.Weight 30%Biased caution / insufficient data · 20 / 100
Sec Attitude?The SEC takes a cautious stance on most tokens, with securities disputes ahead.Weight 30%There is controversy and insufficient data · 20 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Client stability relies on the underlying public blockchain.Weight 15%Inheriting the stability of the underlying chain · 70 / 100
D- Peer Comparison
Export CSV MAGAD- · 26.54 | RogueD- · 26.66 | GaiAID- · 26.65 | Artificial Superintelligence AllianceD- · 26.64 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 26.54 | 26.66 | 26.65 | 26.64 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 11.25 | 37.5 | 37.5 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 33.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team Governance | 54 | 30 | 56 | 70.72 |
| Market Ecosystem | 47.87 | 9.63 | 59.98 | 51.84 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 51.75 | 0 | 0 |



Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.