Treasure MAGIC

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public, detailed roadmaps and delivery records.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of detailed delivery information for recent upgrades.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?Project plans were adjusted due to financial crises, affecting delivery.Weight 15%There are major adjustments · 20 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Relies on a mature Ethereum PoS mechanism, offering high security.Weight 30%Dependency on the underlying chain (PoS) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a long time and has been market-tested.Weight 15%About 5 years · 85 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgraded quality assessment data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?Clients relying on the underlying chain are diverse and have a certain degree of resilience.Weight 20%Depends on the underlying chain · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of clear information on deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a small amount of uncirculated supply, but there is a supply cap.Weight 25%There is a small amount of inflation · 60 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of clear staking or lock-up data, or low proportions.Weight 25%Data is insufficient or undervalued · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply cap that helps with long-term value.Weight 20%There is an upper limit · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Background information of core team members is public, but execution records are insufficient.Weight 30%The core team is stable · 60 / 100

Governance mechanisms?It has a community-driven DAO governance mechanism with high governance intensity.Weight 25%DAO Governance (Strong) · 90 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funds are highly transparent, with publicly available financing information.Weight 25%Higher transparency · 85 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token holdings are highly concentrated, posing risks of centralization.Weight 20%Highly concentrated · 10 / 100

Active Address?A high daily active address score indicates good user engagement.Weight 30%High activity · 95 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?It has been deployed on multiple mainstream chains and possesses certain cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%3. Chains · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of TVL data for projects themselves in DeFi.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Developer community?It exists in the GitHub repository but lacks activity data.Weight 20%Exists but its activity level is unknown · 55 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Major security incidents have occurred in history, resulting in asset losses.Weight 25%He was once attacked · 10 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There are risks associated with backdoor code and may face regulatory challenges.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?There is a risk of backdoor code, which may face SEC scrutiny.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a backdoor code risk, and the frequency of potential vulnerabilities is unknown.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100