MBG By Multibank Group MBG

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 45 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of publicly available recent upgrade delivery data.Weight 30%Underestimated/insufficient data · 25 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 45 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 45 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on a mature Ethereum PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The token has been up for a short time and lacks experience in mainnet operation.Weight 15%< 1 year · 30 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of public information on the quality of project upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?Relying on the Ethereum mainnet, client diversity is good.Weight 20%Good · 80 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear token deflationary mechanism was found.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There are token unlock events, and the chips are highly concentrated.Weight 25%Potential inflation present · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No clear staking or lock-up mechanisms were found.Weight 25%&None · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Despite the supply cap, the chips are highly concentrated, and their effectiveness is questionable.Weight 20%1 billion · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team has limited information and lacks public development activities.Weight 30%Weak · 40 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Project governance mechanisms are centralized, lacking community participation.Weight 25%Centralised · 20 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of public information on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token ownership and control are highly concentrated.Weight 20%Highly concentrated · 10 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well.Weight 30%Activity level is good · 75.7 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project ecosystem is mainly concentrated on Ethereum, lacking cross-chain or L2 integration.Weight 25%Single Chain (Ethereum) · 20 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not a DeFi protocol and does not have direct DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%No related DeFi TVL · 0 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public developer community activities and code contributions.Weight 20%Low activity · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%&None · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The regulatory compliance score is extremely low, with considerable uncertainty.Weight 30%Too cautious/unfriendly · 10 / 100

Sec Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, and the SEC's attitude may be unfriendly.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 10 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug frequency data.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100