MemeCore M

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap delivery data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a recent lack of publicly disclosed records of major upgrades and development activities.Weight 30%No obvious upgrades · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?There is a lack of publicly available pending delivery milestone information, making accurate assessment impossible.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?The lack of public historical delay records makes it impossible to assess project management efficiency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?It adopts an innovative PoM consensus mechanism, but its long-term stability and security remain to be verified.Weight 30%PoM (Innovation) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime, and network stability and maturity still require time to be verified.Weight 15%About 1 year · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a recent lack of publicly available records of major upgrades, making it impossible to assess the quality of upgrades.Weight 35%No obvious upgrades · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?The lack of public client diversity information may pose a single point of risk.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear deflationary mechanism design, weak token value capture capability.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Lacking a hedging mechanism, the total supply far exceeds the circulating supply, posing potential high inflation risks.Weight 25%There is potential high inflation · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, staking rate data is missing, and there is insufficient control over token liquidity.Weight 25%Very Low · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Although there is a supply cap, combined with other economic model factors, its positive effect is limited.Weight 20%10 billion · 10 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and have received investment from well-known VC institutions.Weight 30%A good background · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms carry certain risks of centralization, but their transparency is acceptable.Weight 25%It is highly centralized · 77 / 100

Financial Transparency?Funding transparency is moderate, and the project team's use of funds needs further disclosure.Weight 25%Normal · 77 / 100

Concentration of key people?The core team members are stable, and the permission management mechanism is relatively well-established.Weight 20%Stable · 90 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is extremely low, and user engagement is insufficient.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 5 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Low ecosystem integration, poor cross-chain interoperability.Weight 25%Somewhat less · 5 / 100

DeFi TVL?Non-DeFi projects lack independent DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Developer community?Developer communities are inactive, and codebase updates are infrequent.Weight 20%Inactive · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are risks of backdoor code and permission leakage, and the results of security audits are inconsistent.Weight 25%Backdoor code exists · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of regulatory compliance information, resulting in extremely low compliance scores.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?As a meme coin, its securities nature is controversial and faces potential regulatory risks.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency makes it impossible to assess code stability.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100