Midnight NIGHT

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and on-time data delivery.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 35 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of detailed information about recent upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 35 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on Cardano and BNB Chain, it adopts a mature PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time, and the project is still in its early stages.Weight 15%About 0.5 years · 30 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data poses risks of centralization.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Tokens can be issued in additional quantities, but there is no clear deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Tokens can be issued in additional quantities, posing potential inflation risks.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Staking or lock-up rates are extremely low, token liquidity is high, and selling pressure is high.Weight 25%Very Low · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Although there is a nominal cap, tokens can be issued in additional minting, making the cap virtually meaningless.Weight 20%24 billion (additional issuance possible) · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Limited background information of the core team, insufficient data on development activity.Weight 30%Moderate team background · 40 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Lack of transparent governance mechanisms and transparent data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of detailed information on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token holding is highly concentrated, posing single-point risk.Weight 20%Extremely high · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is performing well and user engagement is high.Weight 30%95.29 / 100 · 95.3 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on two mainstream public chains and possesses certain cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%2 · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data from the project's own ecosystem, resulting in low cross-chain liquidity.Weight 25%Insufficient data (low ecosystem TVL) · 20 / 100

Developer community?Developer activity is trending at zero, and community engagement needs improvement.Weight 20%Low activity · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Tokens can be issued additionally, posing a serious risk of permission leakage.Weight 25%There is a potential risk of permission leakage · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The nature of the privacy chain and centralization risks may face regulatory challenges.Weight 30%Leaning cautious (privacy chain + centralized risk) · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?The privacy chain nature and centralization risks may face SEC scrutiny.Weight 30%Leaning cautious (privacy chain + centralized risk) · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Data is lacking, but given the overall security risks, a conservative assessment is made.Weight 15%Insufficient data (high potential risk) · 0 / 100