MSTR2100 MSTR

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap milestone data makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends are zero, indicating no significant upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%No recent upgrades · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on a mature Ethereum PoS mechanism, it offers high security.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has only been running for a short time, so it still needs time to verify its stability.Weight 15%About 1.5 years · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?The recent trend in development activity is zero, indicating no significant upgrades.Weight 35%No recent upgrades · 0 / 100

Client Diversity?Relying on the Ethereum ecosystem, it has good client diversity.Weight 20%Good (Ethereum) · 85 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%No clear deflation · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?Supply is near the maximum limit, and inflationary pressures are extremely low.Weight 25%Very low (near the upper limit) · 80 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of public staking or lock-up data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear supply hardtop, with fixed total volume.Weight 20%21 million (Hardtop) · 95 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team has limited background information and lacks well-known VC endorsements.Weight 30%General background · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The project is highly centralized and lacks decentralized governance mechanisms.Weight 25%Centralised · 20 / 100

Financial Transparency?High financial transparency is conducive to community oversight.Weight 25%Relatively high · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?The top ten token-holding addresses are highly concentrated and face centralization risks.Weight 20%Relatively high · 25 / 100

Active Address?A high number of daily active addresses indicates active user engagement.Weight 30%High · 100 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The tokens are mainly deployed on Ethereum, with limited cross-chain ecosystems.Weight 25%Single (Ethereum) · 30 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not DeFi and has no relevant TVL data.Weight 25%None (non-DeFi) · 0 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public developer community activities and codebases.Weight 20%Inactive · 10 / 100

Historical Major Failure?So far, no major security incidents have been found.Weight 25%&None · 95 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of compliance information, and the regulatory environment is cautious toward meme tokens.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 30 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC has tightened its regulation of crypto assets and has taken a cautious stance toward meme tokens.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 30 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Contracts carry the risk of modifiable slippage, but overall privilege function sensitivity is low.Weight 15%Low (contract risk) · 70 / 100