NVIDIA xStock NVDAX

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and milestone information.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade records and delivery information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No clear pending delivery milestones were found.Weight 20%No public milestones · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of historical delivery records makes it impossible to assess delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Inheriting the consensus mechanisms of multiple mature public chains.Weight 30%Inheriting Multi-Chain Consensus (PoS/PoSA) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The project started relatively short and operated for less than a year.Weight 15%About 1 year (2025-07-02 to present) · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?Agency contracts can be upgraded, but details of recent upgrades are lacking.Weight 35%Agency contracts, upgrade capabilities exist · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?As a token, this metric does not apply directly.Weight 20%Not applicable (tokens) · 50 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No explicit token burn or deflationary mechanisms have been found.Weight 30%No explicit deflation mechanism · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a lack of public data on token minting or inflation.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, and liquidity is concentrated.Weight 25%About 0% · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear cap on token supply.Weight 20%887,220.00 NVDAX · 80 / 100

Core Development Team?Insufficient disclosure of core team background information.Weight 30%Limited information · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The degree of centralization in project governance mechanisms is relatively high.Weight 25%Centralised · 20 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of public information on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Concentration of key people?There are agency contracts and high concentration of positions.Weight 20%High · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of active on-chain addresses is excellent.Weight 30%High · 100 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project supports multiple mainstream public blockchains and L2s.Weight 25%Multi-chain support (8+ items) · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of token-specific DeFi TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Developer community?Lack of active developer community activities.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 40 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract contains proxy backdoor code, posing high security risks.Weight 25%There is a risk of backdoor code · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?There is a lack of clear regulatory stance regarding the token.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Sec Attitude?Tokenized shares are controversial under SEC regulation.Weight 30%Controversy (tokenized stocks) · 20 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?As a token, this metric does not apply directly.Weight 15%Not applicable (tokens) · 50 / 100