Paimon SpaceX SPV Token SPCX
Paimon SpaceX SPV Token leads with roadmap delivery and team governance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding an E+ rating.
Sector Rank #704 · Global Rank #1801
Overall Rating
E+ · 18.18 / 100Paimon SpaceX SPV Token has an overall rating E+f E (total score 18.18), ranking highly in six dimensions for roadmap delivery, team governance, and security compliance. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating team conclusion: "Paimon SpaceX SPV Token has relative advantages in roadmap delivery, team governance, and security compliance, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
35/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap milestone data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity has been very limited, with no significant upgrades or deliveries.Weight 30%No recent upgrades · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
History Extension Record?Lack of historical roadmap delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Technical Implementation
26.5/100Consensus Mechanism?Relying on BNB Chain's PoSA mechanism carries centralization risks.Weight 30%PoSA (Centralization Risk) · 40 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has short runtime and limited historical data.Weight 15%About 0.8 years · 30 / 100
Recent upgrades?No recent notable code commits or upgrades.Weight 35%No recent upgrades · 0 / 100
Client Diversity?As a BNB Chain token, client diversity depends on the underlying chain.Weight 20%Rely on BSC · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
0/100Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Maximum supply is far above current supply, indicating potential high inflation.Weight 25%There is potential high inflation · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?No staking or lock-up mechanisms, resulting in high token liquidity.Weight 25%0% · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?There is a supply cap, but the current circulating supply is far below the limit, posing a high risk of potential dilution.Weight 20%4,000,000 SPCX (but currently very low circulating supply) · 0 / 100
Team Governance
30/100Core Development Team?The core team's information disclosure is average, and development activities are inactive.Weight 30%Limited information · 50 / 100
Governance mechanisms?The project is non-decentralized, and governance mechanisms are not transparent.Weight 25%Centralised · 10 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of public information on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100
Concentration of key people?The token is highly concentrated in a few addresses, posing a single-point risk.Weight 20%Extremely high · 0 / 100
Market Ecosystem
0/100Active Address?The number of active on-chain addresses is extremely small, and market participation is low.Weight 30%Extremely low (about 0.01) · 0 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed only on the BNB Chain, lacking cross-chain or multi-ecosystem scaling.Weight 25%1 (BNB Chain) · 0 / 100
DeFi TVL?The project is not a DeFi protocol and does not have relevant TVL data.Weight 25%Very low (non-DeFi projects) · 0 / 100
Developer community?Developer communities are inactive, lacking code contributions.Weight 20%Extremely inactive · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
28/100Historical Major Failure?Lack of a public record of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%No public record · 70 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of regulatory compliance information for projects in major jurisdictions.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 10 / 100
Sec Attitude?Lack of clear SEC stance on this token or project.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 10 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public client bug reports or fix records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100
E+ Peer Comparison
Export CSV Main Street USDE+ · 19.99 | GoGoPoolE+ · 19.98 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 18.18 | 19.99 | 19.98 | 19.98 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 30 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 0 | 1.56 | 28 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 30 | 52.8 | 68.32 |
| Market Ecosystem | 1.34 | 45.95 | 36.53 | 1.02 |
| Security & Compliance | 29.54 | 0 | 0 | 0 |


Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.