Pixels PIXEL

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of near-term roadmaps and on-time delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 35 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity trends are poor, and upgrade delivery data is insufficient.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 20 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public historical delay records, and no negative information is available.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 60 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on the Ronin sidechain, it adopts PoA/DPoS consensus for high efficiency.Weight 30%PoA/DPoS (Ronin) · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime but has demonstrated stability as a game chain.Weight 15%About 2.25 years · 75 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of specific quality data for recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?As a specific game sidechain, client diversity may be limited.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 40 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Tokens have use cases but lack a clear deflationary burn mechanism.Weight 30%Weak (no explicit destruction) · 20 / 100

Inflation rate?There is a token unlock plan, increasing circulation and increasing unlocking pressure.Weight 25%Exist, with an unlocking plan · 25 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of clear staking or lock-up data may result in low staking rates.Weight 25%Data is insufficient or undervalued · 20 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear token supply hardhead, which helps stabilize its long-term value.Weight 20%5 billion (hardtop) · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have strong backgrounds and are backed by well-known VCs.Weight 30%The core team is clear and well-established · 90 / 100

Governance mechanisms?A community governance mechanism is being planned and will be used for treasury management in the future.Weight 25%Community Governance (Planned) · 80 / 100

Financial Transparency?High transparency of funds, with a strong track record in treasury management.Weight 25%Relatively high · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?No clear negative data, and the initial concentration of the project is reasonable.Weight 20%Normal · 80 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is excellent, and user engagement is high.Weight 30%High (100/100) · 100 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The ecosystem is mainly focused on Ronin and Ethereum, which are highly functional.Weight 25%2 (Ronin, Ethereum) · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not a DeFi core but has active trading volume and a healthy market.Weight 25%Insufficient data (non-DeFi core) · 70 / 100

Developer community?There is a lack of public data on developer community activity, resulting in low development activity.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 30 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Safety score: High safety rating, no major safety incident records.Weight 25%&None · 95 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The regulatory environment is tightening, and project compliance scores are low.Weight 30%Somewhat cautious · 50 / 100

Sec Attitude?The SEC's stance on crypto assets is unclear, and the project's compliance score is low.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 40 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Security Score: Code security rating is good, but bug frequency is expected to be low.Weight 15%to be on the low side · 70 / 100