Play PLAY

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of public records of recent upgrades.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical records of project delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Based on the mature Polygon PoS mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (Proven) · 85 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has short runtime and limited historical data.Weight 15%About 3 months · 30 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of recent upgraded quality assessment data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of information on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of public information on deflationary mechanisms.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Tokens can be minted, but the inflation rate is opaque.Weight 25%It can be issued additionally, but the specific inflation rate is unknown · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The proportion of locked positions is extremely low and there is a lack of a staking mechanism.Weight 25%Very Low · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Tokens can be issued in additional supply with no fixed supply cap.Weight 20%No hardtop · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members have limited information and average backgrounds.Weight 30%The team is small, and core members have average backgrounds · 40 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The project is highly centralized and lacks decentralized governance.Weight 25%Centralised · 20 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financing quotas are public, but the use of funds lacks transparency.Weight 25%Financing information is public, but transparency in fund usage is insufficient · 50 / 100

Concentration of key people?The core team has few members, posing a concentration risk.Weight 20%High · 20 / 100

Active Address?Very few active addresses and low user engagement.Weight 30%Very Low · 0 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The ecosystem is mainly focused on Polygon, with few integrated projects.Weight 25%Mainly on Polygon, where ecosystem integration is low · 10 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for projects themselves may be extremely low.Weight 25%Insufficient data, project TVL may be extremely low · 0 / 100

Developer community?Lack of developer community activity data, GitHub activity is minimal.Weight 20%Developer activity is extremely low · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract contains backdoor code and additional issuance permissions, posing high security risks.Weight 25%There are risks of backdoor code and additional issuance · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of information on regulatory attitudes in major jurisdictions.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?There is a lack of specific information about the SEC's stance on the project.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100