Plume PLUME

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap delivery data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a recent lack of clear records of protocol upgrades and deliveries.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 10 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?No public pending delivery milestones, resulting in low transparency.Weight 20%non disclosed · 0 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Lack of clear consensus mechanism details, speculated to be PoA/DPoS.Weight 30%Insufficient data (presumed to be PoA/DPoS) · 50 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime and is still in its early stages.Weight 15%About 1 year · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of data on client diversity suggests low diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data (estimated to be low) · 20 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear token deflationary mechanism was found.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?Cyclical supply is far below aggregate supply, indicating potentially high inflation.Weight 25%There is potential high inflation · 10 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of staking data, with extremely low lock-up ratios.Weight 25%Low / Insufficient data · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a supply cap, but a large number of tokens have yet to circulate.Weight 20%10 billion PLUME (large uncirculated amount) · 40 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are visible, but the CTO has passed away and affects technical leadership.Weight 30%Team members are visible, but the CTO is deceased · 40 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Governance mechanisms are centralized, but they score high in authenticity.Weight 25%Centralized governance (high authenticity) · 60 / 100

Financial Transparency?Financing information is open and transparent, and fund management is highly transparent.Weight 25%Relatively high · 85 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token holding is highly concentrated, posing potential risks.Weight 20%Relatively high · 30 / 100

Active Address?A high score for daily active addresses indicates good user activity.Weight 30%Very high · 100 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Deployed on two mainstream chains, with broad ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%2 (Ethereum, BSC) · 60 / 100

DeFi TVL?Atypical DeFi projects, lacking direct TVL data but relevant.Weight 25%DeFi association exists (insufficient data) · 70 / 100

Developer community?Lack of active developer community data, insufficient GitHub activity.Weight 20%Underestimated / Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Historical Major Failure?Contracts have backdoor code and permission leaks, triggering a security red line.Weight 25%There are backdoor codes and permission leaks · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Approved by the US SEC to register as a transfer agent, with a regulatory attitude.Weight 30%Friendly (SEC Approved) · 95 / 100

Sec Attitude?Approved by the SEC to register as a transfer agent, presumed to be a non-securities.Weight 30%Non-securities (presumption) / friendly · 95 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100