Prospective PROS

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of publicly available roadmap milestone data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of publicly available information on recent upgrade deliveries.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As a multi-chain token, its security depends on the underlying public chain.Weight 30%Relying on underlying chain consensus · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The token launched in early 2021 and has been running for a long time.Weight 15%About 5.4 years · 85 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of publicly available information on recent upgrade quality.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Client Diversity?As tokens, client diversity depends on the underlying public chain where they deploy.Weight 20%Depends on the underlying chain · 70 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?There is a lack of a clear deflationary mechanism and the function of issuing additional currency.Weight 30%No clear mechanism · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?The contract has an inscription function, posing potential inflation risks.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 20 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The lock-up ratio is extremely low, which may affect token stability.Weight 25%Very Low · 10 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to value stability.Weight 20%1 billion · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team background and VC endorsement scores are relatively low.Weight 30%General background · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?The project has a single owner's address, and the governance mechanism is centralized.Weight 25%Centralised · 20 / 100

Financial Transparency?Lack of transparent information on fund usage and proposal voting.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contracts have a single owner, with key figures concentrated in power.Weight 20%High · 20 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is low, and user participation is insufficient.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 11.48 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project has been deployed on multiple mainstream public blockchains, with extensive ecosystem coverage.Weight 25%5 · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?The project is not DeFi-type and lacks relevant TVL data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Developer community?Lack of publicly available developer community activity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract has an additional issuance function, posing a serious security risk.Weight 25%There is a risk of additional issuance · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?The additional issuance feature may raise negative concerns from regulators.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 20 / 100

Sec Attitude?The additional offering function may raise questions about the SEC's securities status.Weight 30%called “correct sequence of measures”. · 20 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?As a token, the frequency of client bugs depends on the underlying public chain where it is deployed.Weight 15%Depends on the underlying chain · 70 / 100