Rain RAIN

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public roadmap delivery data, and the development continuity metric is zero.Weight 35%to be on the low side · 10 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent upgrade delivery information and cannot be evaluated.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of public data on historical delays.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As an Arbitrum L2, it inherits the security of Ethereum's PoS consensus mechanism.Weight 30%PoS (inherited from Ethereum) · 90 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has been running for a short time, and the project is still in its early stages.Weight 15%Less than 1 year · 30 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information and quality assessments regarding the latest upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Client Diversity?There is a lack of specific data on client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 20 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?No clear deflationary mechanisms have been found, such as token burning.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?There have been numerous token unlock events, leading to high inflationary pressures.Weight 25%High (continuously unlocked) · 5 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The proportion of staking or lock-up is extremely low, and market liquidity risk is relatively high.Weight 25%Very Low · 5 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There are clear supply caps that contribute to long-term value stability.Weight 20%1.15 trillion · 100 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team members are clear and have received investment and recognition from multiple top VCs.Weight 30%The core team is clear, supported by top VCs · 85 / 100

Governance mechanisms?There is a lack of detailed information about specific governance mechanisms and transparency.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Financial Transparency?Secured multiple rounds of financing, with ample capital reserves and high transparency.Weight 25%High (ample funding) · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?The lack of a multi-signature mechanism poses a high risk of concentration of key personnel.Weight 20%High (no multiple signatures) · 10 / 100

Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is relatively low, and user engagement needs improvement.Weight 30%to be on the low side · 18.3 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on Arbitrum L2 and belongs to the Ethereum ecosystem.Weight 25%1 (Arbitrum L2) · 50 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi has extremely low total locked value, with insufficient ecosystem applications and liquidity.Weight 25%$3.95 million (very low) · 5 / 100

Developer community?Lack of public developer activity data, and inactive communities.Weight 20%Inactive · 0 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There is a red line risk of permission leakage, and security is extremely low.Weight 25%There is a risk of privilege leakage · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Regulatory compliance scores are extremely low, facing intense regulatory scrutiny.Weight 30%Too cautious/unfriendly · 5 / 100

Sec Attitude?Given the extremely low compliance scores for the project, the SEC's attitude may be unfriendly.Weight 30%unfriendly (presumed) · 5 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of public data on the frequency of client bugs.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 20 / 100