
Ring USD USDR
Ring USD leads with roadmap delivery and team governance, with economic models remaining the main focus and currently holding an E rating.
Sector Rank #1397 · Global Rank #2391
Overall Rating
E · 9.52 / 100Ring USD has an overall rating Ef E (total 9.52), ranking high in six dimensions for roadmap delivery, team governance, and market ecosystem. The main point of deduction is the economic model (0 points) — mainly affected by chip concentration (0 points) and short- to medium-term selling pressure (0 points).
Rating Team Conclusion: "Ring USD has relative advantages in roadmap delivery, team governance, and market ecosystem, but its current shortcomings are concentrated in its economic model." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
0/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public delivery data, making it impossible to evaluate.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery records.Weight 30%No recent upgrades · 0 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of historical delay records.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Technical Implementation
10.5/100Consensus Mechanism?Stablecoin projects typically adopt PoA or centralized management.Weight 30%PoA (estimated) · 30 / 100
Main network years of operation?The mainnet has short runtime and limited historical data.Weight 15%About 0.3 years · 10 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of recent upgrade quality and impact data.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Tokenomics
16/100Deflationary Mechanism?As a stablecoin, it has no explicit deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?There is a lack of public inflation rate data.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The percentage of locked holders is 0.Weight 25%0% · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Market data shows clear supply caps.Weight 20%100,400,000 USDR · 80 / 100
Team Governance
11.5/100Core Development Team?The core team's background and VC endorsements are average.Weight 30%Moderate team background · 30 / 100
Governance mechanisms?There is a lack of open decentralized governance mechanisms.Weight 25%Centralized (presumed) · 10 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of transparency data on funds.Weight 25%to be on the low side · 0 / 100
Concentration of key people?The top ten token-holding addresses are highly concentrated.Weight 20%High · 0 / 100
Market Ecosystem
2.57/100Active Address?The number of daily active addresses is extremely low.Weight 30%Very little · 0.22 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Mainly deployed on Ethereum, with low cross-chain integration.Weight 25%1 (Ethereum) · 10 / 100
DeFi TVL?Lack of data on total DeFi locked value.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Developer community?Developer activity trend is zero, and the community is inactive.Weight 20%Inactive · 0 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?The contract carries risks of backdoor code and permission leakage.Weight 25%There are backdoors and permission leaks · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?Lack of clear SEC stance on the nature of its securities.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100
E Peer Comparison
Export CSV Ring USDE · 9.52 | FAYAE · 13.3 | GaleonE · 13.28 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 9.52 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 13.28 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 37.5 | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 0 | 0 | 24.75 | 0.9 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 30 | 49.6 | 42.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 1.48 | 17.52 | 8.2 | 9.85 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |


Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.