SaucerSwap SAUCE
SaucerSwap leads in team governance and roadmap delivery, with security and compliance remaining the main focus, currently firmly holding an E rating.
Rating updated 2026-08-04
E8.15 / 100
Sector Rank #163 · Global Rank #2476
Overall Rating
E · 8.15 / 100Roadmap Delivery
11.25
Tokenomics
2.35
Team Governance
30
Market Ecosystem
9.37
Security & Compliance
0
Overall Score
8.15
SaucerSwap has an overall rating Ef E (total 8.15), ranking high in team governance, roadmap delivery, and market ecosystem across six dimensions. The main point of deduction is safety compliance (0 points)—mainly affected by regulatory compliance (0 points), multiple-entry ratio (0 points), and other sub-items.
Rating Team Conclusion: "SaucerSwap has relative advantages in team governance, roadmap delivery, and market ecosystem, but its current shortcomings are focused on security and compliance." " It is recommended to observe cautiously and not use it as a core configuration basis for now.
Six-Dimension Rating Breakdown
Roadmap Delivery
11.25/100Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and milestone delivery data.Weight 35%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Last 4 upgrades achieved?There is a lack of recent upgrade records and achievements.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Milestones to Deliver?Undisclosed and clearly stated milestone information pending delivery.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
History Extension Record?There is a lack of public information on historical project delays.Weight 15%18 / 100 · 18.3 / 100
Technical Implementation
70/100Consensus Mechanism?The underlying Hedera uses Hashgraph consensus, offering high performance and maturity.Weight 30%90 / 100 · 90 / 100
Main network years of operation?The project went live in June 2023, with the mainnet running for a relatively long period.Weight 15%80 / 100 · 80 / 100
Recent upgrades?There is a lack of specific data on the quality and impact of recent upgrades.Weight 35%60 / 100 · 60 / 100
Client Diversity?Hedera network client diversity is relatively low.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Tokenomics
2.35/100Deflationary Mechanism?The tokenomics model does not explicitly include a deflationary mechanism.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Inflation rate?Some tokens remain to be released, posing potential inflationary pressures.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Staking rate/position lock-up rate?Lack of explicit staking or lock data for SAUCE tokens.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Supply Upper Limit?Although tokens have supply caps, their value capture capability is weak.Weight 20%12 / 100 · 11.75 / 100
Team Governance
29.99/100Core Development Team?Core team members have publicly available information and possess certain industry experience.Weight 30%33 / 100 · 33.3 / 100
Governance mechanisms?Tokens have governance functions, but lack transparency in specific mechanisms.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Financial Transparency?Lack of public information on fund usage and transparency.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100
Concentration of key people?The core team is relatively small in size, with a high concentration of key personnel.Weight 20%50 / 100 · 50 / 100
Market Ecosystem
9.32/100Active Address?The number of active addresses is low, and user engagement needs improvement.Weight 30%7 / 100 · 7.05 / 100
Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on the Hedera and Base chains.Weight 25%16 / 100 · 15.8 / 100
DeFi TVL?DeFi has relatively low total value locked and limited market influence.Weight 25%5 / 100 · 5 / 100
Developer community?Developer community activity and the number of third-party integrations are low.Weight 20%10 / 100 · 10 / 100
Security & Compliance
0/100Historical Major Failure?The contract carries the risk of permission leakage and has a very low security level.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Regulatory Attitude?The project has serious security loopholes and extremely high regulatory risks.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Sec Attitude?The project has serious security vulnerabilities, and the SEC's attitude will be unfriendly.Weight 30%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
Client Bug Frequency?The contract carries the risk of permission leakage and has a very low security level.Weight 15%0 / 100 · 0 / 100
E Peer Comparison
Export CSV| SaucerSwapE · 8.15 |  FAYAE · 13.3 |  PolkaswapE · 13.3 |  GaleonE · 13.28 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 8.15 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 13.28 |
| Roadmap Delivery | 11.25 | 37.5 | 0 | 37.5 |
| Technical Implementation | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Tokenomics | 2.35 | 0 | 24.75 | 0.9 |
| Team Governance | 30 | 30 | 49.6 | 42.4 |
| Market Ecosystem | 9.37 | 17.52 | 8.2 | 9.85 |
| Security & Compliance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Discussion · Comments
No comments yet.