SOON SOON

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?There is a lack of public roadmap delivery data, making it impossible to evaluate.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Recent development activity and technical upgrades are lacking.Weight 30%Somewhat less · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 35 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Adopts a mature hybrid consensus mechanism with good performance.Weight 30%PoH + PoS (mature) · 80 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet has a relatively short runtime and still needs long-term validation.Weight 15%About 0.5 years · 20 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of client-side diversity data.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of effective deflationary mechanisms and weak token value capture.Weight 30%&None · 0 / 100

Inflation rate?A large number of tokens are yet to be unlocked, and inflationary pressure is enormous.Weight 25%High · 0 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?The staking rate is extremely low, the token liquidity is high, and concentration is high.Weight 25%Very Low · 0 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?Despite the upper limit, issues such as high concentration have led to extremely low economic model scores.Weight 20%1 billion (fixed) · 0 / 100

Core Development Team?The core team is relatively small in size and has limited background information.Weight 30%3 people (average background) · 30 / 100

Governance mechanisms?There is a community voting mechanism, and governance activity is relatively high.Weight 25%Community Voting (Active) · 88 / 100

Financial Transparency?High transparency of funds, and a sound proposal voting mechanism.Weight 25%Relatively high · 88 / 100

Concentration of key people?Token holdings are highly concentrated, posing risks of centralization.Weight 20%Extremely high · 5 / 100

Active Address?The number of active addresses is moderate, and ecosystem activity is average.Weight 30%65.04 / 100 · 65 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream chains and has good cross-chain capabilities.Weight 25%3 · 70 / 100

DeFi TVL?Lack of DeFi TVL data for the project itself.Weight 25%Insufficient data · 35 / 100

Developer community?Developer communities are low in activity and code contributions are insufficient.Weight 20%Somewhat less · 20 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are backdoor code and permission leaks, posing extremely high security risks.Weight 25%Backdoor code exists · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Sec Attitude?Lack of clear SEC stance information.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 0 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 0 / 100