Space and Time SXT

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmaps and on-time data delivery.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Lack of recent upgrade delivery details.Weight 30%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of publicly available milestone information to be delivered.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?Lack of public records of historical extensions.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?Uses innovative Proof of SQL ZK-proof to provide verifiable computations.Weight 30%Proof of SQL (ZK-proof) · 75 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet will launch in May 2025, with a relatively short runtime.Weight 15%About 1 year · 60 / 100

Recent upgrades?Lack of detailed information and quality assessment of recent upgrades.Weight 35%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Client Diversity?Lack of public information about client diversity.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 40 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?Lack of a clear mechanism for token destruction or deflation.Weight 30%No clear deflation · 30 / 100

Inflation rate?There are regular token unlocks, which face short-term supply pressure.Weight 25%There is unlocking pressure · 50 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?There is a lack of public staking or lock-up data, or the proportion is extremely low.Weight 25%Data is insufficient or undervalued · 40 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a clear token supply cap and a fixed total supply.Weight 20%5 billion (hardtop) · 90 / 100

Core Development Team?Core team members are experienced and supported by well-known VCs.Weight 30%Experienced and strong-backed · 90 / 100

Governance mechanisms?Safety scores and governance intensity are high, and governance mechanisms are sound.Weight 25%Good (Safety Score 90.29) · 90 / 100

Financial Transparency?High transparency of funds, proposal voting, and treasury management are open.Weight 25%High (90/100) · 90 / 100

Concentration of key people?There is a lack of detailed information on the concentration of power among key figures.Weight 20%Insufficient data · 80 / 100

Active Address?Daily active addresses performed well, with high user engagement.Weight 30%Good (78/100) · 78 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?Supports multiple mainstream public blockchains and L2s, offering a high degree of ecosystem integration.Weight 25%Multi-chain support (6+) · 80 / 100

DeFi TVL?As a data layer, DeFi TVL is not a core metric; data is missing.Weight 25%Not applicable / Insufficient data · 50 / 100

Developer community?GitHub activity data is missing, and the developer community's activity is questionable.Weight 20%Data is insufficient or weak · 35 / 100

Historical Major Failure?There are no publicly available records of significant safety incidents.Weight 25%No major records · 90 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?Lack of clear regulatory compliance information leads to lower compliance scores.Weight 30%Insufficient data / biased caution · 45 / 100

Sec Attitude?The lack of clear SEC confirmation of the nature of its token creates uncertainty.Weight 30%There is controversy / insufficient data · 45 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?Lack of public data on client bug frequency.Weight 15%Insufficient data · 50 / 100