StakeStone STO

Roadmap On Time Delivery Rate?Lack of public roadmap milestones and delivery records makes it impossible to assess on-time delivery rates.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Last 4 upgrades achieved?Due to a lack of recent upgrade records and achievements, it is impossible to assess them.Weight 30%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Milestones to Deliver?Lack of public pending delivery milestone information makes it impossible to assess.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

History Extension Record?There is a lack of publicly available historical delay records, making it impossible to assess.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Consensus Mechanism?As an LSD protocol, its security depends on the mature consensus mechanism of the underlying chain.Weight 30%70 / 100 · 70 / 100

Main network years of operation?The mainnet operation time of the project is relatively short, and historical data and stability remain to be verified.Weight 15%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Recent upgrades?There is a lack of detailed information about recent upgrades and quality assessment data.Weight 35%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Client Diversity?There is a lack of public information about the diversity of protocol clients.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Deflationary Mechanism?The contract has minting capability and lacks a clear token burn mechanism.Weight 30%10 / 100 · 10 / 100

Inflation rate?Contracts can be issued additionally, but there is potential inflation risk, and the specific inflation rate is not transparent.Weight 25%20 / 100 · 20 / 100

Staking rate/position lock-up rate?With extremely low lock-up ratios and high token liquidity, it may face selling pressure.Weight 25%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Supply Upper Limit?There is a theoretical supply cap, but contracts can be issued additionally, and the upper limit may be breached.Weight 20%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Core Development Team?Team members have clear backgrounds and have received investments from multiple well-known institutions, demonstrating strong capabilities.Weight 30%80 / 100 · 80 / 100

Governance mechanisms?It scores relatively high in governance strength, but market data shows it is non-decentralized, so continued attention is warranted.Weight 25%75 / 100 · 75 / 100

Financial Transparency?High capital transparency scores, public financing information, and investments from well-known institutions.Weight 25%85 / 100 · 85 / 100

Concentration of key people?Contracts can be issued additionally, and the permission concentration score is average, posing a risk of centralization.Weight 20%60 / 100 · 60 / 100

Active Address?A high daily active address score indicates good user engagement.Weight 30%95 / 100 · 95 / 100

Ecological chain/L2 quantity?The project is deployed on Ethereum and BSC, but scores low in third-party integrations.Weight 25%50 / 100 · 50 / 100

DeFi TVL?DeFi's total value locked is relatively average, and its market influence needs improvement.Weight 25%55 / 100 · 55 / 100

Developer community?There is a lack of public developer community activity data, making it impossible to assess them.Weight 20%30 / 100 · 30 / 100

Historical Major Failure?The contract carries the risk of permission leakage for additional issuance, triggering a security red line and posing a significant security hazard.Weight 25%0 / 100 · 0 / 100

Regulatory Attitude?As a DeFi protocol, it faces the generally cautious attitude of global regulators.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Sec Attitude?As a liquid staking derivative, its securities nature is disputed by the U.S. SEC.Weight 30%40 / 100 · 40 / 100

Client Bug Frequency?There is a lack of public data on the frequency of client bugs, making it impossible to evaluate.Weight 15%30 / 100 · 30 / 100